Exploring the Therapeutic Affordances of Self-Harm Online Support Communities: An Online Survey of Members

Overview

Journal JMIR Ment Health

Specialties Health Services
Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 2017 Oct 15

PMID 29030324

Citations 11

Authors

Neil S Coulson

Emma Bullock

Karen Rodham

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: A growing number of online communities have been established to support those who self-harm. However, little is known about the therapeutic affordances arising from engagement with these communities and resulting outcomes.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the presence of therapeutic affordances as reported by members of self-harm online support communities.

Methods: In total, 94 respondents (aged 13-63 years, mean=23.5 years; 94% female) completed an online survey exploring their experiences of engaging with a self-harm online support community. Respondents varied in terms of how long they had been accessing an online community, with 22% (21/94) accessing less than 1 year, 39% (37/94) 1 to 2 years, 14% (13/94) 2 to 3 years, and 24.5% (23/94) more than 3 years. Responses were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis.

Results: The results of our analysis describe each of the five therapeutic affordances that were present in the data, namely (1) connection, the ability to make contact with others who self-harm for the purposes of mutual support and in so doing reduce feelings of loneliness and isolation; (2) adaptation, that is, how use of online support varies in relation to the personal circumstances of the individual user; (3) exploration, that is, the ability to learn about self-harm and learn about strategies to reduce or stop self-harming behavior; (4) narration, that is, the ability to share experiences, as well as read about the experiences of others; and (5) self-presentation, that is, how and what users present about themselves to others in the online community.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that engagement with self-harm online support communities may confer a range of therapeutic benefits for some users, which may serve to minimize the psychosocial burden of self-harm and promote positive coping strategies. In addition, the online nature of the support available may be helpful to those who are unable to access face-to-face support.

Citing Articles

A mixed studies systematic review on the health and wellbeing effects, and underlying mechanisms, of online support groups for chronic conditions.

Mills F, Drury J, Hall C, Weston D, Symons C, Amlot R Commun Psychol. 2025; 3(1):40.

PMID: 40089592 DOI: 10.1038/s44271-025-00217-6.

How to create a mindful community of practice: exploring the social functions of group-based mindfulness practices facilitated via Zoom during COVID-19.

Tobias Mortlock J, Alapati H, Edginton T Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1356057.

PMID: 39944032 PMC: 11814460. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1356057.

What are the available online resources targeting psychosocial burden among stroke survivors and their informal caregivers: A scoping review.

Delvallee M, Garreau R, Termoz A, Ploteau P, Derex L, Schott A Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241240895.

PMID: 38515613 PMC: 10956153. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241240895.

Exploring the Types of Social Support Exchanged by Survivors of Pediatric Stroke and Their Families in an Online Peer Support Community: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.

Wright W, Howdle C, Coulson N, De Simoni A J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49440.

PMID: 38488858 PMC: 10980984. DOI: 10.2196/49440.

Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy.

Lobban F, Coole M, Donaldson E, Glossop Z, Haines J, Johnston R BMJ Open. 2023; 13(7):e075142.

PMID: 37518092 PMC: 10387651. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075142.

References

Sinclair J, Gray A, Rivero-Arias O, Saunders K, Hawton K . Healthcare and social services resource use and costs of self-harm patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010; 46(4):263-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-010-0183-5. View

Carroll R, Metcalfe C, Gunnell D . Hospital presenting self-harm and risk of fatal and non-fatal repetition: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e89944. PMC: 3938547. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089944. View

Whitlock J, Lader W, Conterio K . The internet and self-injury: what psychotherapists should know. J Clin Psychol. 2007; 63(11):1135-43. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20420. View

Hoffmann W . Telematic technologies in mental health caring: a web-based psychoeducational program for adolescent suicide survivors. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2006; 27(5):461-74. DOI: 10.1080/01612840600599978. View

Lewis S, Heath N, St Denis J, Noble R . The scope of nonsuicidal self-injury on YouTube. Pediatrics. 2011; 127(3):e552-7. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2317. View

Shoebotham A, Coulson N . Therapeutic Affordances of Online Support Group Use in Women With Endometriosis. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(5):e109. PMC: 4877503. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5548. View

Fortune S, Hawton K . Deliberate self-harm in children and adolescents: a research update. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006; 18(4):401-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.yco.0000172059.55778.c9. View

Perry I, Corcoran P, Fitzgerald A, Keeley H, Reulbach U, Arensman E . The incidence and repetition of hospital-treated deliberate self harm: findings from the world's first national registry. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e31663. PMC: 3282760. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031663. View

Holbrey S, Coulson N . A qualitative investigation of the impact of peer to peer online support for women living with polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Womens Health. 2013; 13:51. PMC: 3867626. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-51. View

10.

Whitlock J, Powers J, Eckenrode J . The virtual cutting edge: the internet and adolescent self-injury. Dev Psychol. 2006; 42(3):407-17. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.407. View

11.

Gavin J, Rodham K, Poyer H . The presentation of "pro-anorexia" in online group interactions. Qual Health Res. 2008; 18(3):325-33. DOI: 10.1177/1049732307311640. View

12.

Lewis S, Seko Y . A Double-Edged Sword: A Review of Benefits and Risks of Online Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Activities. J Clin Psychol. 2015; 72(3):249-62. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22242. View

13.

McAndrew S, Warne T . Hearing the voices of young people who self-harm: implications for service providers. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014; 23(6):570-9. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12093. View

14.

Baker D, Fortune S . Understanding self-harm and suicide websites: a qualitative interview study of young adult website users. Crisis. 2008; 29(3):118-22. DOI: 10.1027/0227-5910.29.3.118. View

15.

Lewis S, Baker T . The possible risks of self-injury web sites: a content analysis. Arch Suicide Res. 2011; 15(4):390-6. DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2011.616154. View

16.

Mars B, Heron J, Crane C, Hawton K, Lewis G, Macleod J . Clinical and social outcomes of adolescent self harm: population based birth cohort study. BMJ. 2014; 349:g5954. PMC: 4205277. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5954. View

17.

Daine K, Hawton K, Singaravelu V, Stewart A, Simkin S, Montgomery P . The power of the web: a systematic review of studies of the influence of the internet on self-harm and suicide in young people. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e77555. PMC: 3813687. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077555. View

18.

COBB S . Presidential Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 1976; 38(5):300-14. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003. View

19.

Bergen H, Hawton K, Waters K, Ness J, Cooper J, Steeg S . Premature death after self-harm: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet. 2012; 380(9853):1568-74. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61141-6. View

20.

Hawton K, Harriss L, Hall S, Simkin S, Bale E, Bond A . Deliberate self-harm in Oxford, 1990-2000: a time of change in patient characteristics. Psychol Med. 2003; 33(6):987-95. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291703007943. View