» Articles » PMID: 29026600

Effect of Prophylactic Clipping in Colorectal Endoscopic Resection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Oct 14
PMID 29026600
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: The efficacy of clipping for preventing delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic resection is still controversial. To assess the efficacy of prophylactic clipping, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane library, and the Igaku-chuo-zasshi database for randomized trials eligible for inclusion in our meta-analysis. We identified seven eligible randomized trials from the database search, and compared the effect of clipping versus non-clipping with respect to delayed bleeding and perforation. Data from eligible studies were combined to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs).

Results: Postoperative bleeding was observed in 41 of 1526 cases (2.7%) without clipping and in 32 of 1533 cases (2.1%) with clipping (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.39-1.47,  = 0.414). There was no significant heterogeneity among the trial results (I-Square = 26.7%,  = 0.22). In the subgroup analysis based on small tumor size (<20 mm) and large tumor size (≥20 mm), there were no significant differences. Compared with non-clipping, the pooled OR of developing perforation with clipping was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.14-7.25), indicating no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions: Prophylactic clipping did not decrease the occurrence of delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic resection. Clipping could be of interest in patients with a high risk of bleeding (anticoagulation) or large lesions, but with the available trials data to prove this are scarce.

Citing Articles

Association between prophylactic closure of mucosal defect and delayed adverse events after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yi S, Cai Q, Zhang L, Fu H, Zhang J, Shen M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(10):e077822.

PMID: 39424389 PMC: 11492945. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077822.


Dual Channel Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.

Saraidaridis J, Gaetani R, Marcello P Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2024; 37(5):295-301.

PMID: 39132201 PMC: 11309799. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770943.


Systematic review of self-assembling peptides as topical agents for treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding.

Voiosu A, State M, Dragan V, Vaduva S, Balanescu P, Mateescu R Clin Endosc. 2024; 57(4):454-465.

PMID: 38919060 PMC: 11294863. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.168.


Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.

Keating E, Leyden J, OConnor D, Lahiff C World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023; 15(5):338-353.

PMID: 37274555 PMC: 10236981. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.338.


Efficacy of self-assembling peptide in mitigating delayed bleeding after advanced endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal lesions: A meta-analysis.

Gopakumar H, Vohra I, Sharma N, Puli S Endosc Int Open. 2023; 11(5):E553-E560.

PMID: 37251794 PMC: 10219783. DOI: 10.1055/a-2057-4505.


References
1.
Matsumoto M, Fukunaga S, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T . Risk factors for delayed bleeding after endoscopic resection for large colorectal tumors. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012; 42(11):1028-34. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hys131. View

2.
Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Fujihara S, Matsunaga T, Ayaki M . Simple and reliable treatment for post-EMR artificial ulcer floor with snare cauterization for 10- to 20-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized prospective study (with video). Surg Endosc. 2014; 29(9):2818-24. PMC: 4541705. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3983-y. View

3.
Nishizawa T, Ochiai Y, Uraoka T, Akimoto T, Mitsunaga Y, Goto O . Endoscopic slip-knot clip suturing method: prospective pilot study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 85(2):433-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.047. View

4.
Shioji K, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi M, Nakamura A, Azumaya M, Takeuchi M . Prophylactic clip application does not decrease delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57(6):691-4. DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.193. View

5.
Qadeer M, Vargo J, Khandwala F, Lopez R, Zuccaro G . Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 3(11):1049-56. DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00742-1. View