» Articles » PMID: 29021917

A Feasibility Pilot Using Telehealth Videoconference Monitoring of Home-based NMES Resistance Training in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Oct 13
PMID 29021917
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The objective of the study was to investigate the feasibility and initial efficacy of telehealth communication in conjunction with surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) resistance training (RT) to induce muscle hypertrophy.

Materials And Methods: This was a home-based setting of within-subject control design of trained vs controlled limbs. Five men with chronic (>1 year postinjury) motor-complete spinal cord injury (SCI) participated in a twice-weekly telehealth videoconference program using home-based NMES-RT for 8 weeks. Stimulation was applied to the knee extensor muscle group of the trained leg, while the untrained leg served as a control. Participants received real-time feedback to ensure a proper setup of electrodes and stimulator to monitor subject safety throughout the entire training session. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure cross-sectional areas (CSAs) and intramuscular fat (IMF) of the whole thigh and individual muscle groups. Average two-way travel time, distance traveled in miles and total cost of gas per mile were calculated.

Results: Participants had 100% compliance. Trained whole and absolute knee extensor muscle CSA increased by 13% (=0.002) and 18% (=0.0002), with no changes in the controlled limb. Absolute knee flexor and adductor CSAs increased by 3% (=0.02) and 13% (=0.0001), respectively. Absolute whole thigh and knee extensor IMF CSAs decreased significantly in the trained limb by 14% (=0.01) and 36% (=0.0005), respectively, with no changes in controlled limb.

Discussion: The pilot work documented that using telehealth communication is a safe, feasible and potentially cost-reducing approach for monitoring home-based NMES-RT in persons with chronic SCI. All trained muscles showed detectable muscle hypertrophy with concomitant decrease in ectopic adipose tissue.

Citing Articles

The effect of home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation-resistance training and protein supplementation on lean mass in persons with spinal cord injury: A pilot study.

Hoekstra S, King J, Fenton J, Kirk N, Willis S, Phillips S Physiol Rep. 2024; 12(19):e70073.

PMID: 39358836 PMC: 11446856. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.70073.


Effects of two different paradigms of electrical stimulation exercise on cardio-metabolic risk factors after spinal cord injury. A randomized clinical trial.

Gorgey A, Khalil R, Carter W, Ballance B, Gill R, Khan R Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1254760.

PMID: 37808500 PMC: 10556465. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1254760.


Models of Telehealth Service Delivery in Adults With Spinal Cord Injuries: Scoping Review.

Mirbaha S, Morgan A, Tang A, Smith-Turchyn J, Richardson J JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023; 10:e41186.

PMID: 37384377 PMC: 10365587. DOI: 10.2196/41186.


The Physiology of Neurogenic Obesity: Lessons from Spinal Cord Injury Research.

McMillan D, Bigford G, Farkas G Obes Facts. 2023; 16(4):313-325.

PMID: 37231872 PMC: 10427964. DOI: 10.1159/000530888.


Electrical Stimulation Exercise for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Healthcare Provider Perspective.

Dolbow D, Gorgey A, Johnston T, Bersch I J Clin Med. 2023; 12(9).

PMID: 37176591 PMC: 10179213. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093150.


References
1.
Munn J, Herbert R, Gandevia S . Contralateral effects of unilateral resistance training: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004; 96(5):1861-6. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00541.2003. View

2.
Gorgey A, Cho G, Dolbow D, Gater D . Differences in current amplitude evoking leg extension in individuals with spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013; 33(1):161-70. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130941. View

3.
Gorgey A, Shepherd C . Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and decreased intramuscular fat after unilateral resistance training in spinal cord injury: case report. J Spinal Cord Med. 2010; 33(1):90-5. PMC: 2853337. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2010.11689681. View

4.
Gorgey A, Dolbow D, Dolbow J, Khalil R, Castillo C, Gater D . Effects of spinal cord injury on body composition and metabolic profile - part I. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014; 37(6):693-702. PMC: 4231957. DOI: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000245. View

5.
Dryden D, Saunders L, Rowe B, May L, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson L . Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42(9):513-25. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101629. View