» Articles » PMID: 29020571

Factors and Molecules That Could Impact Cell Differentiation in the Embryo Generated by Nuclear Transfer

Overview
Journal Organogenesis
Date 2017 Oct 12
PMID 29020571
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer is a technique to create an embryo using an enucleated oocyte and a donor nucleus. Nucleus of somatic cells must be reprogrammed in order to participate in normal development within an enucleated egg. Reprogramming refers to the erasing and remodeling of cellular epigenetic marks to a lower differentiation state. Somatic nuclei must be reprogrammed by factors in the oocyte cytoplasm to a rather totipotent state since the reconstructed embryo must initiate embryo development from the one cell stage to term. In embryos reconstructed by nuclear transfer, the donor genetic material must respond to the cytoplasmic environment of the cytoplast and recapitulate this normal developmental process. Enucleation is critically important for cloning efficiency because may affect the ultrastructure of the remaining cytoplast, thus resulting in a decline or destruction of its cellular compartments. Nonetheless, the effects of in vitro culturing are yet to be fully understood. In vitro oocyte maturation can affect the abundance of specific transcripts and are likely to deplete the developmental competence. The epigenetic modifications established during cellular differentiation are a major factor determining this low efficiency as they act as epigenetic barriers restricting reprogramming of somatic nuclei. In this review we discuss some factors that could impact cell differentiation in embryo generated by nuclear transfer.

Citing Articles

Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Pigs.

Glanzner W, Rissi V, Bordignon V Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2647:197-210.

PMID: 37041336 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3064-8_10.


Horse ooplasm supports in vitro preimplantation development of zebra ICSI and SCNT embryos without compromising YAP1 and SOX2 expression pattern.

Gambini A, Duque Rodriguez M, Rodriguez M, Briski O, Flores Bragulat A, Demergassi N PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238948.

PMID: 32915925 PMC: 7485800. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238948.

References
1.
Kang L, Kou Z, Zhang Y, Gao S . Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)--a new era of reprogramming. J Genet Genomics. 2010; 37(7):415-21. DOI: 10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60060-6. View

2.
Meng L, Rutledge J, Zhu Y, Kidder G, Khamsi F, Armstrong D . Role of germinal vesicle on protein synthesis in rat oocyte during in vitro maturation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1996; 43(2):228-35. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199602)43:2<228::AID-MRD12>3.0.CO;2-#. View

3.
Morgan H, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W . Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet. 2005; 14 Spec No 1:R47-58. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddi114. View

4.
Loureiro B, Block J, Favoreto M, Carambula S, Pennington K, Ealy A . Consequences of conceptus exposure to colony-stimulating factor 2 on survival, elongation, interferon-τ secretion, and gene expression. Reproduction. 2011; 141(5):617-24. DOI: 10.1530/REP-10-0511. View

5.
Leung A, Schones D, Natarajan R . Using epigenetic mechanisms to understand the impact of common disease causing alleles. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012; 24(5):558-63. PMC: 3478440. DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.07.004. View