» Articles » PMID: 29018885

Size and Shape of the Associations of Glucose, HbA, Insulin and HOMA-IR with Incident Type 2 Diabetes: the Hoorn Study

Overview
Journal Diabetologia
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2017 Oct 12
PMID 29018885
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Glycaemic markers and fasting insulin are frequently measured outcomes of intervention studies. To extrapolate accurately the impact of interventions on the risk of diabetes incidence, we investigated the size and shape of the associations of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 h post-load glucose (2hPG), HbA, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: The study population included 1349 participants aged 50-75 years without diabetes at baseline (1989) from a population-based cohort in Hoorn, the Netherlands. Incident type 2 diabetes was defined by the WHO 2011 criteria or known diabetes at follow-up. Logistic regression models were used to determine the associations of the glycaemic markers, fasting insulin and HOMA-IR with incident type 2 diabetes. Restricted cubic spline logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the shape of the associations.

Results: After a mean follow-up duration of 6.4 (SD 0.5) years, 152 participants developed diabetes (11.3%); the majority were screen detected by high FPG. In multivariate adjusted models, ORs (95% CI) for incident type 2 diabetes for the highest quintile in comparison with the lowest quintile were 9.0 (4.4, 18.5) for FPG, 6.1 (2.9, 12.7) for 2hPG, 3.8 (2.0, 7.2) for HbA, 1.9 (0.9, 3.6) for fasting insulin and 2.8 (1.4, 5.6) for HOMA-IR. The associations of FPG and HbA with incident diabetes were non-linear, rising more steeply at higher values.

Conclusions/interpretation: FPG was most strongly associated with incident diabetes, followed by 2hPG, HbA, HOMA-IR and fasting insulin. The strong association with FPG is probably because FPG is the most frequent marker for diabetes diagnosis. Non-linearity of associations between glycaemic markers and incident type 2 diabetes should be taken into account when estimating future risk of type 2 diabetes based on glycaemic markers.

Citing Articles

Urban Environmental Threat Moderates the Relationship Between Depression and Insulin Resistance Among Latinxs With Type 2 Diabetes.

Matlock K, Albright-Pierce M, Bermudez-Millan A, Perez-Escamilla R, Segura-Perez S, Wagner J Stress Health. 2024; 40(6):e3504.

PMID: 39579357 PMC: 11636443. DOI: 10.1002/smi.3504.


Metabolic Phenotype and Risk of Obesity-Related Cancers in the Women's Health Initiative.

Karra P, Hardikar S, Winn M, Anderson G, Haaland B, Shadyab A Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024; 18(2):63-72.

PMID: 39540294 PMC: 11790363. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0082.


Biomarkers of glucose-insulin homeostasis and incident type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: results from the Vitamin D and Omega-3 trial.

Qian F, Guo Y, Li C, Liu Y, Luttmann-Gibson H, Gomelskaya N Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024; 23(1):393.

PMID: 39488682 PMC: 11531120. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02470-1.


The Impact of Cornelian Cherry ( L.) on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Frumuzachi O, Kieserling H, Rohn S, Mocan A, Crisan G Nutrients. 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 38999920 PMC: 11243109. DOI: 10.3390/nu16132173.


Low Handgrip Strength (Possible Sarcopenia) With Insulin Resistance Is Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Tajima T, Kaga H, Someya Y, Tabata H, Naito H, Kakehi S J Endocr Soc. 2024; 8(3):bvae016.

PMID: 38370441 PMC: 10872678. DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvae016.


References
1.
FRIEDEWALD W, Levy R, Fredrickson D . Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972; 18(6):499-502. View

2.
Grootenhuis P, Westenbrink S, Sie C, de Neeling J, Kok F, Bouter L . A semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in epidemiologic research among the elderly: validation by comparison with dietary history. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48(7):859-68. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00013-t. View

3.
Wang J, Yuan S, Zhu L, Fu H, Li H, Hu G . Effects of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance on predicting incident type 2 diabetes in a Chinese population with high post-prandial glucose. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004; 66(2):183-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.03.002. View

4.
Li C, Tsai S, Chou P . Relative role of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction in the progression to type 2 diabetes--The Kinmen Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2003; 59(3):225-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(02)00249-8. View

5.
Harati H, Hadaegh F, Saadat N, Azizi F . Population-based incidence of Type 2 diabetes and its associated risk factors: results from a six-year cohort study in Iran. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:186. PMC: 2708154. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-186. View