Experiences with Online Consultation Systems in Primary Care: Case Study of One Early Adopter Site

Overview

Journal Br J Gen Pract

Specialty Public Health

Date 2017 Oct 11

PMID 28993306

Citations 21

Authors

Michael Casey

Sara Shaw

Deborah Swinglehurst

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: There is a strong policy drive towards implementing alternatives to face-to-face consultations in general practice to improve access, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. These alternatives embrace novel technologies that are assumed to offer potential to improve care.

Aim: To explore the introduction of one online consultation system (Tele-Doc) and how it shapes working practices.

Design And Setting: Mixed methods case study in an inner-city general practice.

Method: The study was conducted through interviews with IT developers, clinicians, and administrative staff, and scrutiny of documents, websites, and demonstrator versions of Tele-Doc, followed by thematic analysis and discourse analysis.

Results: Three interrelated themes were identified: online consultation systems as innovation, managing the 'messiness' of general practice consultations, and redistribution of the work of general practice. These themes raise timely questions about what it means to consult in contemporary general practice. Uptake of Tele-Doc by patients was low. Much of the work of the consultation was redistributed to patients and administrators, sometimes causing misunderstandings. The 'messiness' of consultations was hard to eliminate. In-house training focused on the technical application rather than associated transformations to practice work that were not anticipated. GPs welcomed varied modes of consulting, but the aspiration of improved efficiency was not realised in practice.

Conclusion: Tele-Doc offers a new kind of consultation that is still being worked out in practice. It may offer convenience for patients with discrete, single problems, and a welcome variation to GPs' workload. Tele-Doc's potential for addressing more complex problems and achieving efficiency is less clear, and its adoption may involve unforeseeable consequences.

Citing Articles

A theory-based analysis of the implementation of online asynchronous telemedicine platforms into primary care practices using Normalisation Process Theory.

Leighton C, Joseph-Williams N, Porter A, Edwards A, Cooper A BMC Prim Care. 2025; 26(1):27.

PMID: 39915751 PMC: 11800456. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-025-02717-0.

The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.

Keuper J, van Tuyl L, de Geit E, Rijpkema C, Vis E, Batenburg R BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1099.

PMID: 39300456 PMC: 11414290. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9.

Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review.

Eccles A, Bryce C, Driessen A, Pope C, MacLellan J, Gronlund T Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 74(747):e674-e682.

PMID: 38242712 PMC: 11388093. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0149.

Digital Health Interventions to Improve Access to and Quality of Primary Health Care Services: A Scoping Review.

Erku D, Khatri R, Endalamaw A, Wolka E, Nigatu F, Zewdie A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(19).

PMID: 37835125 PMC: 10572344. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20196854.

Effectiveness and safety of asynchronous telemedicine consultations in general practice: a systematic review.

Leighton C, Cooper A, Porter A, Edwards A, Joseph-Williams N BJGP Open. 2023; 8(1).

PMID: 37783479 PMC: 11169987. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0177.

References

Cresswell K, Sheikh A . Undertaking sociotechnical evaluations of health information technologies. Inform Prim Care. 2014; 21(2):78-83. DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v21i2.54. View

Chaudoir S, Dugan A, Barr C . Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:22. PMC: 3598720. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-22. View

Newhouse N, Lupianez-Villanueva F, Codagnone C, Atherton H . Patient use of email for health care communication purposes across 14 European countries: an analysis of users according to demographic and health-related factors. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(3):e58. PMC: 4376107. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3700. View

Brant H, Atherton H, Ziebland S, McKinstry B, Campbell J, Salisbury C . Using alternatives to face-to-face consultations: a survey of prevalence and attitudes in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66(648):e460-6. PMC: 4917048. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685597. View

Andreassen H, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki C, Dumitru R, Pudule I, Santana S . European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007; 7:53. PMC: 1855923. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53. View

Campbell J, Fletcher E, Britten N, Green C, Holt T, Lattimer V . Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014; 384(9957):1859-1868. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61058-8. View

Greenhalgh T, Wood G, Bratan T, Stramer K, Hinder S . Patients' attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008; 336(7656):1290-5. PMC: 2413413. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a114. View

Atherton H . Use of email for consulting with patients in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(608):118-9. PMC: 3582947. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X664072. View

Green C, Holden J . Diagnostic uncertainty in general practice. A unique opportunity for research?. Eur J Gen Pract. 2003; 9(1):13-5. DOI: 10.3109/13814780309160388. View

10.

Balint E . The possibilities of patient-centered medicine. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1969; 17(82):269-76. PMC: 2236836. View

11.

Car J, Sheikh A . Email consultations in health care: 2--acceptability and safe application. BMJ. 2004; 329(7463):439-42. PMC: 514210. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.439. View

12.

Hobbs F, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, Stevens S, Perera-Salazar R, Holt T . Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007-14. Lancet. 2016; 387(10035):2323-2330. PMC: 4899422. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6. View

13.

Bate P, Robert G . Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15(5):307-10. PMC: 2565809. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016527. View

14.

Shaw S, Bailey J . Discourse analysis: what is it and why is it relevant to family practice?. Fam Pract. 2009; 26(5):413-9. PMC: 2743732. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmp038. View

15.

Berg M, Aarts J, van der Lei J . ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. Methods Inf Med. 2003; 42(4):297-301. View

16.

Krachler N, Greer I . When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 124:215-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.045. View

17.

Greenhalgh T, Swinglehurst D . Studying technology use as social practice: the untapped potential of ethnography. BMC Med. 2011; 9:45. PMC: 3108909. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-45. View

18.

Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S . The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(4). PMC: 3401833. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001574. View

19.

Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Car J . Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 11:CD007978. PMC: 11627151. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007978.pub2. View

20.

Greenhalgh T, Vijayaraghavan S, Wherton J, Shaw S, Byrne E, Campbell-Richards D . Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1):e009388. PMC: 4735312. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388. View