Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting

Overview

Journal IEEE Trans Biomed Eng

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Biophysics

Date 2017 Oct 10

PMID 28991732

Citations 31

Authors

Erik P Lamers

Aaron J Yang

Karl E Zelik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Goal: The purpose of this study was: 1) to design and fabricate a biomechanically-assistive garment which was sufficiently lightweight and low-profile to be worn underneath, or as, clothing, and then 2) to perform human subject testing to assess the ability of the garment to offload the low back muscles during leaning and lifting.

Methods: We designed a prototype garment which acts in parallel with the low back extensor muscles to reduce forces borne by the lumbar musculature. We then tested eight healthy subjects while they performed common leaning and lifting tasks with and without the garment. We recorded muscle activity, body kinematics, and assistive forces.

Results: The biomechanically-assistive garment offloaded the low back muscles, reducing erector spinae muscle activity by an average of 23-43% during leaning tasks, and 14-16% during lifting tasks.

Conclusion: Experimental findings in this study support the feasibility of using biomechanically-assistive garments to reduce low back muscle loading, which may help reduce injury risks or fatigue due to high or repetitive forces.

Significance: Biomechanically-assistive garments may have broad societal appeal as a lightweight, unobtrusive, and cost-effective means to mitigate low back loading in daily life.

Citing Articles

Soft back exosuit controlled by neuro-mechanical modeling provides adaptive assistance while lifting unknown loads and reduces lumbosacral compression forces.

Moya-Esteban A, Refai M, Sridar S, van der Kooij H, Sartori M Wearable Technol. 2025; 6:e9.

PMID: 40071245 PMC: 11894419. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2025.3.

Elastic textile-based wearable modulation of musculoskeletal load: A comprehensive review of passive exosuits and resistance clothing.

Talukder A, Jo J Wearable Technol. 2025; 6:e11.

PMID: 40071238 PMC: 11894418. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2025.2.

Can back exosuits simultaneously increase lifting endurance and reduce musculoskeletal disorder risk?.

Rodzak K, Slaughter P, Wolf D, Ice C, Fine S, Zelik K Wearable Technol. 2025; 5():e17.

PMID: 39811480 PMC: 11729484. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2024.8.

On human-in-the-loop optimization of human-robot interaction.

Slade P, Atkeson C, Donelan J, Houdijk H, Ingraham K, Kim M Nature. 2024; 633(8031):779-788.

PMID: 39322732 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07697-2.

Musculoskeletal models determine the effect of a soft active exosuit on muscle activations and forces during lifting and lowering tasks.

Yan C, Banks J, Allaire B, Quirk D, Chung J, Walsh C J Biomech. 2024; 176:112322.

PMID: 39305855 PMC: 11560613. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112322.

References

Schechtman H, Bader D . Fatigue damage of human tendons. J Biomech. 2002; 35(3):347-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00177-4. View

McGill S, Norman R . Partitioning of the L4-L5 dynamic moment into disc, ligamentous, and muscular components during lifting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11(7):666-78. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198609000-00004. View

Bosch T, van Eck J, Knitel K, De Looze M . The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work. Appl Ergon. 2016; 54:212-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003. View

Hansson T, Keller T, Spengler D . Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading. J Orthop Res. 1987; 5(4):479-87. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100050403. View

Freburger J, Holmes G, Agans R, Jackman A, Darter J, Wallace A . The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(3):251-8. PMC: 4339077. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.543. View

Adams M, Hutton W, Stott J . The resistance to flexion of the lumbar intervertebral joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980; 5(3):245-53. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198005000-00007. View

Andersson G . Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999; 354(9178):581-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4. View

Martin B, Deyo R, Mirza S, Turner J, Comstock B, Hollingworth W . Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008; 299(6):656-64. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.6.656. View

Brinckmann P, Biggemann M, Hilweg D . Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013; 4 Suppl 2:iii-27. DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(89)90071-5. View

10.

Abdoli-E M, Agnew M, Stevenson J . An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2006; 21(5):456-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.021. View

11.

Nachemson A . Disc pressure measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981; 6(1):93-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198101000-00020. View

12.

Nemeth G, Ohlsen H . Moment arm lengths of trunk muscles to the lumbosacral joint obtained in vivo with computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11(2):158-60. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198603000-00011. View

13.

Bazrgari B, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N . Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads. Eur Spine J. 2006; 16(5):687-99. PMC: 2213554. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0240-7. View

14.

Potvin J, McGill S, Norman R . Trunk muscle and lumbar ligament contributions to dynamic lifts with varying degrees of trunk flexion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16(9):1099-107. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199109000-00015. View

15.

Chaffin D, Park K . A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1973; 34(12):513-25. DOI: 10.1080/0002889738506892. View

16.

Schultz A, Andersson G, Ortengren R, Haderspeck K, Nachemson A . Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64(5):713-20. View

17.

Matsui H, Maeda A, Tsuji H, Naruse Y . Risk indicators of low back pain among workers in Japan. Association of familial and physical factors with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(11):1242-7; discussion 1248. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199706010-00014. View

18.

Yandell M, Quinlivan B, Popov D, Walsh C, Zelik K . Physical interface dynamics alter how robotic exosuits augment human movement: implications for optimizing wearable assistive devices. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14(1):40. PMC: 5437613. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0247-9. View

19.

de Leva P . Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. J Biomech. 1996; 29(9):1223-30. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00178-6. View

20.

Granata K, Marras W . The influence of trunk muscle coactivity on dynamic spinal loads. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(8):913-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199504150-00006. View