» Articles » PMID: 28989908

The Effects of Hydroxyethyl Starch 6% and Crystalloid on Volume Preloading Changes Following Spinal Anesthesia

Overview
Journal Adv Biomed Res
Date 2017 Oct 10
PMID 28989908
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hypotension is one of the most common complications after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Normally, preloading with fluids, especially crystalloids, is used to prevention of hypotension.

Methods: In the present randomized clinical trial study, 120 parturients presenting for elective cesarean section with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II received either 15 cc normal saline or 7 cc/kg hydroxyethyl starch 6% (Voluven) fluid. Information regarding to systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate, incidence of hypotension, adverse effects, the total dose of atropine, and ephedrine were recorded in before and 3, 6, 9, 15, and 20 min after spinal anesthesia. Furthermore, Apgar score of newborn at the 1 and 5 min after birth was recorded.

Results: There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure at different stages such as: Exactly after spinal and 3, 6, 15, and 20 min after spinal anesthesia between two groups ( > 0.05). Total dose of ephedrine and atropine were similar between groups ( > 0.05), respectively. There was no significant difference in Apgar score at the 1 and 5 min after birth between two groups. There were not any adverse effects of drugs in two groups.

Conclusions: The results of this study show that hydroxyethyl starch 6% compared to normal saline are similar to prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Citing Articles

Fluid loading therapy to prevent spinal hypotension in women undergoing elective caesarean section: Network meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and meta-regression.

Rijs K, Mercier F, Lucas D, Rossaint R, Klimek M, Heesen M Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020; 37(12):1126-1142.

PMID: 33109924 PMC: 7752245. DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001371.


Comparison between Colloid Preload and Coload in Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Dumanli Ozcan A, Kesimci E, Balci C, Kanbak O, Kasikara H, But A Anesth Essays Res. 2019; 12(4):879-884.

PMID: 30662124 PMC: 6319061. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_127_18.

References
1.
Dahlgren G, Granath F, Pregner K, Rosblad P, Wessel H, Irestedt L . Colloid vs. crystalloid preloading to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005; 49(8):1200-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00730.x. View

2.
Miller T, Gan T . Total intravenous anesthesia and anesthetic outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015; 29 Suppl 1:S11-5. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.01.022. View

3.
Xu S, Wu H, Zhao Q, Shen X, Guo X, Wang F . The median effective volume of crystalloid in preventing hypotension in patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012; 62(3):312-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70132-0. View

4.
Alimian M, Mohseni M, Safaeian R, Faiz S, Azad Majedi M . Comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 6% and crystalloids for preloading in elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Med Arch. 2015; 68(4):279-81. PMC: 4240562. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.279-281. View

5.
Dahlgren G, Granath F, Wessel H, Irestedt L . Prediction of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section and its relation to the effect of crystalloid or colloid preload. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007; 16(2):128-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.10.006. View