» Articles » PMID: 28985725

Factors Influencing the Clinical Decision-making of Midwives: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Oct 8
PMID 28985725
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although midwives make clinical decisions that have an impact on the health and well-being of mothers and babies, little is known about how they make those decisions. Wide variation in intrapartum decisions to refer women to obstetrician-led care suggests that midwives' decisions are based on more than the evidence based medicine (EBM) model - i.e. clinical evidence, midwife's expertise, and woman's values - alone. With this study we aimed to explore the factors that influence clinical decision-making of midwives who work independently.

Methods: We used a qualitative approach, conducting in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 11 Dutch primary care midwives. Data collection took place between May and September 2015. The interviews were semi-structured, using written vignettes to solicit midwives' clinical decision-making processes (Think Aloud method). We performed thematic analysis on the transcripts.

Results: We identified five themes that influenced clinical decision-making: the pregnant woman as a whole person, sources of knowledge, the midwife as a whole person, the collaboration between maternity care professionals, and the organisation of care. Regarding the midwife, her decisions were shaped not only by her experience, intuition, and personal circumstances, but also by her attitudes about physiology, woman-centredness, shared decision-making, and collaboration with other professionals. The nature of the local collaboration between maternity care professionals and locally-developed protocols dominated midwives' clinical decision-making. When midwives and obstetricians had different philosophies of care and different practice styles, their collaborative efforts were challenged.

Conclusion: Midwives' clinical decision-making is a more varied and complex process than the EBM framework suggests. If midwives are to succeed in their role as promoters and protectors of physiological pregnancy and birth, they need to understand how clinical decisions in a multidisciplinary context are actually made.

Citing Articles

Barriers and facilitators influencing midwives' implementation of South Africa's maternal care guidelines in postnatal health: a scoping review.

Okeke N, Ngunyulu R Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025; 26:e16.

PMID: 40017138 PMC: 11883790. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423625000015.


Practice variation in induction of labour: women's role in the decision-making process.

Brabers A, Haaren-Ten Haken T, Keulen J, Offerhaus P, Nieuwenhuijze M, de Jong J Res Health Serv Reg. 2025; 4(1):2.

PMID: 39966231 PMC: 11836261. DOI: 10.1007/s43999-025-00059-z.


A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence-based practice and its associated factors among health professionals in Ethiopia.

Gudeta T, Terefe A, Mengistu G, Sori S BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1518.

PMID: 39616330 PMC: 11608491. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11957-2.


Perspectives of midwives on respectful maternity care.

Lunda P, Minnie C, Lubbe W BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):721.

PMID: 39506692 PMC: 11539527. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06894-1.


Evidence-based intrapartum care practice and associated factors among obstetrics workers in Ethiopia, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Figa Z, Zemeskel A, Alemu A, Abebe M SAGE Open Med. 2024; 12:20503121241261210.

PMID: 39086555 PMC: 11289799. DOI: 10.1177/20503121241261210.


References
1.
Orme L, MAGGS C . Decision-making in clinical practice: how do expert nurses, midwives and health visitors make decisions?. Nurse Educ Today. 1993; 13(4):270-6. DOI: 10.1016/0260-6917(93)90052-4. View

2.
Renfrew M, McFadden A, Bastos M, Campbell J, Channon A, Cheung N . Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014; 384(9948):1129-45. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. View

3.
Page M, Mander R . Intrapartum uncertainty: a feature of normal birth, as experienced by midwives in Scotland. Midwifery. 2013; 30(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.012. View

4.
Johanson R, Newburn M, Macfarlane A . Has the medicalisation of childbirth gone too far?. BMJ. 2002; 324(7342):892-5. PMC: 1122835. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.892. View

5.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View