» Articles » PMID: 28983555

Measuring Institutional Quality in Head and Neck Surgery Using Hospital-Level Data: Negative Margin Rates and Neck Dissection Yield

Overview
Date 2017 Oct 7
PMID 28983555
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Negative margins and lymph node yields (LNY) of 18 or more from neck dissections in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) have been associated with improved patient survival. It is unclear whether these metrics can be used to identify hospitals with improved outcomes.

Objective: To determine whether 2 patient-level metrics would predict outcomes at the hospital level.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A retrospective review of records from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients who underwent primary surgery and concurrent neck dissection for HNSCC between 2004 and 2013. The percentage of patients at each hospital with negative margins on primary resection and an LNY 18 or more from a neck dissection was quantified. Cox proportional hazard models were used to define the association between hospital performance on these metrics and overall survival.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Margin status and lymph node yield at hospital level. Overall survival (OS).

Results: We identified 1008 hospitals in the NCDB where 64 738 patients met inclusion criteria. Of the 64 738 participants, 45 170 (69.8%) were men and 19 568 (30.2%) were women. The mean SD age of included patients was 60.5 (12.0) years. Patients treated at hospitals attaining the combined metric of a 90% or higher negative margin rate and 80% or more of cases with LNYs of 18 or more experienced a significant reduction in mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98). This benefit in survival was independent of the patient-level improvement associated with negative margins (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.71-0.76) and LNY of 18 or more (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.88). Including these metrics in the model neutralized the association of traditional measures of hospital quality (volume and teaching status).

Conclusions And Relevance: Treatment at hospitals that attain a high rate of negative margins and LNY of 18 or more is associated with improved survival in patients undergoing surgery for HNSCC. These surgical outcome measures predicted outcomes independent of traditional, but generally nonmodifiable characteristics. Tracking of these metrics may help identify high-quality centers and provide guidance for institution-level quality improvement.

Citing Articles

Comparison of surgical margins and adjuvant therapy for head and neck cancer by hospital type.

Farquhar D, Lenze N, Tasoulas J, Sheth S, Zevallos J, Lumley C Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(9):5050-5063.

PMID: 39430853 PMC: 11483336. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-2047.


Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Duckett K, Kassir M, Nguyen S, Brennan E, Chera B, Sterba K Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 170(2):320-334.

PMID: 37731255 PMC: 10840985. DOI: 10.1002/ohn.538.


Eugene Nicholas Myers' Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer, 2020: The Surgeon as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery.

Kowalski L Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 27(3):e536-e546.

PMID: 37564472 PMC: 10411134. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761170.


Head and neck cancers: Monitoring quality and reporting outcomes.

Chilkuri M, Vangaveti V, Smith J J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 66(3):455-465.

PMID: 34851013 PMC: 9299932. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13359.


CT for estimating adequacy of lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Rees C, Litchman J, Wu X, Servos M, Kerr D, Halter R Cancer Imaging. 2021; 21(1):61.

PMID: 34802462 PMC: 8607725. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-021-00430-6.


References
1.
Hessel A, Moreno M, Hanna E, Roberts D, Lewin J, El-Naggar A . Compliance with quality assurance measures in patients treated for early oral tongue cancer. Cancer. 2010; 116(14):3408-16. PMC: 6088384. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25031. View

2.
Jalisi S, Bearelly S, Abdillahi A, Truong M . Outcomes in head and neck oncologic surgery at academic medical centers in the United States. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123(3):689-98. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23835. View

3.
Lewis C, Weber R, Hanna E . Quality of care in head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011; 13(2):120-5. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-010-0146-8. View

4.
Anderson C, Sisson K, Moncrieff M . A meta-analysis of margin size and local recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2015; 51(5):464-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.015. View

5.
Birkmeyer J, Siewers A, Finlayson E, Stukel T, Lucas F, Batista I . Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(15):1128-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337. View