» Articles » PMID: 28981878

A NOVEL METHOD TO ESTIMATE LYMPHOCYTE DOSE AND APPLICATION TO PEDIATRIC AND YOUNG ADULT CT PATIENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Overview
Date 2017 Oct 6
PMID 28981878
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite decades of epidemiological research, it remains uncertain whether ionizing radiation can cause lymphomas. Most epidemiological studies of lymphoma risk following non-uniform exposure used dose to red bone marrow (RBM), constituting a small fraction of the lymphocytes, as a surrogate of dose to the lymphocytes. We developed a method to estimate dose to the lymphocytes using the reference distribution of lymphocytes throughout the body and Monte Carlo simulations of computational human phantoms. We applied our method to estimating lymphocyte doses for a pediatric CT patient cohort in the United Kingdom. Estimated dose to the RBM was greater than lymphocyte dose for most scan types (up to 2.6-fold higher, a 5-year-old brain scan) except abdomen scan (RBM dose was about half the lymphocyte dose, a 5-year-old abdomen scan). The lymphocyte dose in the UK cohort showed that T-spine and whole body scans delivered the highest lymphocyte doses (up to 22.4 mGy).

Citing Articles

Lympho-hematopoietic malignancies risk after exposure to low dose ionizing radiation during cardiac catheterization in childhood.

Abalo K, Malekzadeh-Milani S, Hascoet S, Dreuil S, Feuillet T, Damon C Eur J Epidemiol. 2023; 38(7):821-834.

PMID: 37191831 PMC: 11281830. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-023-01010-7.


Epidemiological studies of CT scans and cancer risk: the state of the science.

Berrington de Gonzalez A, Pasqual E, Veiga L Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1126):20210471.

PMID: 34545766 PMC: 9328069. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210471.


Lymphoma and multiple myeloma in cohorts of persons exposed to ionising radiation at a young age.

Little M, Wakeford R, Zablotska L, Borrego D, Griffin K, Allodji R Leukemia. 2021; 35(10):2906-2916.

PMID: 34050261 PMC: 8484030. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01284-4.

References
1.
Hollingsworth C, Frush D, Cross M, Lucaya J . Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(2):401-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800401. View

2.
Lee C, Kim K, Bolch W, Moroz B, Folio L . NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. J Radiol Prot. 2015; 35(4):891-909. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/4/891. View

3.
Shrimpton P, Hillier M, Lewis M, Dunn M . National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol. 2007; 79(948):968-80. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/93277434. View

4.
Kim K, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Pearce M, Salotti J, Parker L, McHugh K . Development of a database of organ doses for paediatric and young adult CT scans in the United Kingdom. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012; 150(4):415-26. PMC: 3400529. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr429. View

5.
. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. A report of age- and gender-related differences in the anatomical and physiological characteristics of reference individuals. ICRP Publication 89. Ann ICRP. 2003; 32(3-4):5-265. View