» Articles » PMID: 28980512

The Accuracy of Maxillary Positioning Using Digital Model Planning and 3D Printed Wafers in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

Overview
Journal J Orthod
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Oct 6
PMID 28980512
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Orthognathic wafers may be made using digital model movements and CAD-CAM technology. This paper analysed the accuracy of maxillary movements using this new process.

Design: Retrospective study of pre and post-operative cephalograms.

Participants: Thirty consecutive orthognathic patients undergoing bimaxillary osteotomies in a UK hospital.

Methods: Jaw movements were planned using cephalometric and Orthoanalyzer™ software. The resultant intermediate and final wafer occlusal relationships were used for wafer fabrication by 3D printing of the inter-occlusal space. Pre- and post-operative lateral cephalograms were compared in terms of maxillary antero-posterior and vertical movements. Statistical analyses including the paired t-test, two-sample t-test and Fisher's exact test.

Results: Wide individual variation was observed between the planned and actual movements. Thirteen cases (43%) had a 2 mm discrepancy in at least one variable. Statistically significant differences between the planned and actual maxillary vertical movements were observed for the molar (U6y: p < 0.0001) and anterior maxillary (Ay: p < 0.01) differences. Analysis of a subgroup with primarily impaction movements demonstrated a statistically significant bias towards excessive maxillary advancement (U1x: p < 0.01) and incisor impaction (U1y: p < 0.01) in this group.

Conclusions: This new digital surgical wafer technique achieves a similar level of accuracy to the conventional facebow and model surgery process.

Citing Articles

Are Virtually Designed 3D Printed Surgical Splints Accurate Enough for Maxillary Reposition as an Intermediate Orthognathic Surgical Guide.

Sarkarat F, Tofighi O, Jamilian A, Fateh A, Abbaszadeh F J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023; 22(4):861-872.

PMID: 38105840 PMC: 10719200. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-023-01942-3.


Accuracy of virtual surgical planning in segmental osteotomy in combination with bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with surgery first approach.

Ying X, Tian K, Zhang K, Ma X, Guo H BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):529.

PMID: 34654418 PMC: 8518167. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01892-7.


The Accuracy of Jaws Repositioning in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery with Traditional Surgical Planning Compared to Digital Surgical Planning in Skeletal Class III Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Barone M, De Stefani A, Baciliero U, Bruno G, Gracco A J Clin Med. 2020; 9(6).

PMID: 32545621 PMC: 7355953. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061840.


CAD/CAM splint and surgical navigation allows accurate maxillary segment positioning in Le Fort I osteotomy.

Shirota T, Shiogama S, Asama Y, Tanaka M, Kurihara Y, Ogura H Heliyon. 2019; 5(7):e02123.

PMID: 31372564 PMC: 6657307. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02123.


[Three-dimensional study of facial soft tissue changes in patients with skeletal Class malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery].

Shi Y, Shang H, Tian L, Bai S, Liu W, Liu Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018; 32(5):612-616.

PMID: 29806352 PMC: 8430026. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201801051.