» Articles » PMID: 28977340

Evaluating Accelerometry Thresholds for Detecting Changes in Levels of Moderate Physical Activity and Resulting Major Mobility Disability

Abstract

Background: An important decision with accelerometry is the threshold in counts per minute (CPM) used to define moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). We explore the ability of different thresholds to track changes in MVPA due to a physical activity (PA) intervention among older adults with compromised function: 760 CPM, 1,041 CPM, and an individualized threshold. We also evaluate the ability of change in accelerometry and self-reported PA to attenuate treatment effects on major mobility disability (MMD).

Methods: Data from a week of hip worn accelerometers and self-reported PA data (30-day recall) were examined from baseline, 6-, 12-, and 24-months of follow-up on 1,528 older adults. Participants were randomized to either PA or Health Education (HE). MMD was objectively defined by loss of ability to walk 400 m during the follow-up.

Results: The three thresholds yielded similar and higher levels of MVPA for PA than HE (p < .001), however, this difference was significantly attenuated in participants with lower levels of physical function. Self-reported PA that captured both walking and strength training totally attenuated the intervention effect for MMD, an 18% reduction to a 3% increase. Accelerometer CPMs showed less attenuation of the intervention effect.

Conclusions: Accelerometry assessment within the LIFE study was not sensitive to change in level in physical activity for older adults with very low levels of physical function. A combination of self-report and objective measures are recommended for use in physical activity intervention studies of the elderly; limitations of accelerometry deserve closer attention.

Citing Articles

Predicting physical functioning status in older adults: insights from wrist accelerometer sensors and derived digital biomarkers of physical activity.

Fan L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang J, Wang X, Wang F J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024; 31(11):2571-2582.

PMID: 39178361 PMC: 11491653. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae224.


Intervening on exercise and daylong movement for weight loss maintenance in older adults: A randomized, clinical trial.

Fanning J, Rejeski W, Leng I, Barnett C, Lovato J, Lyles M Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021; 30(1):85-95.

PMID: 34932885 PMC: 8711609. DOI: 10.1002/oby.23318.


Is Wrist Accelerometry Suitable for Threshold Scoring? A Comparison of Hip-Worn and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph Data in Low-Active Older Adults With Obesity.

Fanning J, Miller M, Chen S, Davids C, Kershner K, Rejeski W J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021; 77(12):2429-2434.

PMID: 34791237 PMC: 9923693. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab347.


Relationships Between Profiles of Physical Activity and Major Mobility Disability in the LIFE Study.

Fanning J, Rejeski W, Chen S, Guralnik J, Pahor M, Miller M J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; 68(7):1476-1483.

PMID: 32196636 PMC: 8284920. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16386.


Assessing physical performance and physical activity in large population-based aging studies: home-based assessments or visits to the research center?.

Portegijs E, Karavirta L, Saajanaho M, Rantalainen T, Rantanen T BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1570.

PMID: 31775684 PMC: 6882080. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7869-8.


References
1.
Marsh A, Lovato L, Glynn N, Kennedy K, Castro C, Domanchuk K . Lifestyle interventions and independence for elders study: recruitment and baseline characteristics. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013; 68(12):1549-58. PMC: 3814232. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glt064. View

2.
Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd K, Masse L, Tilert T, McDowell M . Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 40(1):181-8. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3. View

3.
Nelson M, Rejeski W, Blair S, Duncan P, Judge J, King A . Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007; 116(9):1094-105. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185650. View

4.
Ozemek C, Cochran H, Strath S, Byun W, Kaminsky L . Estimating relative intensity using individualized accelerometer cutpoints: the importance of fitness level. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:53. PMC: 3617038. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-53. View

5.
Copeland J, Esliger D . Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in active, healthy older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2009; 17(1):17-30. DOI: 10.1123/japa.17.1.17. View