» Articles » PMID: 28975832

Systemic and Adjuvant Therapies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Overview
Journal Cancer Control
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Oct 5
PMID 28975832
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma represents the second most common primary liver cancer and is increasing in incidence. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced, nonsurgical stage and only about 1 in 5 cases are surgically resectable. Despite surgery, the 5-year survival is low at only 30%. Multifocal, node- or margin-positive disease is at a higher risk of recurrence after resection. There is no level 1 evidence in support of postoperative adjuvant therapy. A recent adjuvant therapy phase III trial from the Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive-Actions Concertées dans les Cancers Colo-Rectaux et Digestifs (PRODIGE) group reported no survival advantage with adjuvant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin therapy. Locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma is treated with gemcitabine-based systemic chemotherapy with suboptimal response and survival. Integration of local therapy such as focal radiation along with induction chemotherapy is now being investigated in multicenter clinical trials. Recent molecular profiling studies have indicated that about 30% to 40% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cases have actionable mutations. These include fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), isocitrate dehyrogenase 1 (IDH1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and BRAF genetic aberrations. Clinical trials targeting these mutations as well as immune therapy using programmed cell death 1 (PD1) inhibitors indicated a promising early signal showing clinical efficacy.

Citing Articles

Immunotherapy-induced microsatellite instability status shift in recurrent perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report.

Yu H, Deng T, Liu H Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025; 21(1):2471226.

PMID: 39996476 PMC: 11864312. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2471226.


Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Peng Z, Dong J, Tang S, Shi J, Shi T Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1498887.

PMID: 39975594 PMC: 11835659. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1498887.


Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an integrative approach combining ultrasound-based radiomics and inflammation-related markers.

Peng Y, Pang J, Lin P, Chen J, Wen R, Liu C BMC Med Imaging. 2025; 25(1):4.

PMID: 39748308 PMC: 11697736. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01542-8.


Integrative multi-omics analysis reveals the role of tumor-associated endothelial cells and their signature in prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Jiang H, Gao B, Meng Z, Wang Y, Jiao T, Li J J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):948.

PMID: 39427165 PMC: 11490089. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05750-2.


HSPB8-BAG3 chaperone complex modulates cell invasion in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by regulating CASA-mediated Filamin A degradation.

Shu B, Wen Y, Lin R, He C, Luo C, Li F Cancer Biol Ther. 2024; 25(1):2396694.

PMID: 39215616 PMC: 11370900. DOI: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2396694.


References
1.
Nakamura H, Arai Y, Totoki Y, Shirota T, Elzawahry A, Kato M . Genomic spectra of biliary tract cancer. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(9):1003-10. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3375. View

2.
Li T, Qin L, Zhou J, Sun H, Qiu S, Ye Q . Staging, prognostic factors and adjuvant therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection. Liver Int. 2013; 34(6):953-60. DOI: 10.1111/liv.12364. View

3.
Beyoglu D, Idle J . The metabolomic window into hepatobiliary disease. J Hepatol. 2013; 59(4):842-58. PMC: 4095886. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.05.030. View

4.
Jain A, Kwong L, Javle M . Genomic Profiling of Biliary Tract Cancers and Implications for Clinical Practice. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2016; 17(11):58. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-016-0432-2. View

5.
Khan S, Emadossadaty S, G Ladep N, Thomas H, Elliott P, Taylor-Robinson S . Rising trends in cholangiocarcinoma: is the ICD classification system misleading us?. J Hepatol. 2011; 56(4):848-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.11.015. View