» Articles » PMID: 28973784

Peanuts That Keep Aflatoxin at Bay: a Threshold That Matters

Abstract

Aflatoxin contamination in peanuts poses major challenges for vulnerable populations of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Developing peanut varieties to combat preharvest Aspergillus flavus infection and resulting aflatoxin contamination has thus far remained a major challenge, confounded by highly complex peanut-Aspergilli pathosystem. Our study reports achieving a high level of resistance in peanut by overexpressing (OE) antifungal plant defensins MsDef1 and MtDef4.2, and through host-induced gene silencing (HIGS) of aflM and aflP genes from the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. While the former improves genetic resistance to A. flavus infection, the latter inhibits aflatoxin production in the event of infection providing durable resistance against different Aspergillus flavus morphotypes and negligible aflatoxin content in several peanut events/lines well. A strong positive correlation was observed between aflatoxin accumulation and decline in transcription of the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway genes in both OE-Def and HIGS lines. Transcriptomic signatures in the resistant lines revealed key mechanisms such as regulation of aflatoxin synthesis, its packaging and export control, besides the role of reactive oxygen species-scavenging enzymes that render enhanced protection in the OE and HIGS lines. This is the first study to demonstrate highly effective biotechnological strategies for successfully generating peanuts that are near-immune to aflatoxin contamination, offering a panacea for serious food safety, health and trade issues in the semi-arid regions.

Citing Articles

Host-Induced Gene Silencing of the -Methyl Transferase Gene Enhanced Maize Aflatoxin Resistance.

Omolehin O, Raruang Y, Hu D, Han Z, Promyou S, Brown R Toxins (Basel). 2025; 17(1).

PMID: 39852961 PMC: 11769010. DOI: 10.3390/toxins17010008.


Progress in genetic engineering and genome editing of peanuts: revealing the future of crop improvement.

Phogat S, Lankireddy S, Lekkala S, Anche V, Sripathi V, Patil G Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2024; 30(11):1759-1775.

PMID: 39687700 PMC: 11646254. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-024-01534-6.


Genetic engineering and genome editing technologies as catalyst for Africa's food security: the case of plant biotechnology in Nigeria.

Adegbaju M, Ajose T, Adegbaju I, Omosebi T, Ajenifujah-Solebo S, Falana O Front Genome Ed. 2024; 6:1398813.

PMID: 39045572 PMC: 11263695. DOI: 10.3389/fgeed.2024.1398813.


Aspergillus flavus pangenome (AflaPan) uncovers novel aflatoxin and secondary metabolite associated gene clusters.

Gangurde S, Korani W, Bajaj P, Wang H, Fountain J, Agarwal G BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):354.

PMID: 38693487 PMC: 11061970. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-04950-8.


Modes of action and potential as a peptide-based biofungicide of a plant defensin MtDef4.

Li H, Kalunke R, Tetorya M, Czymmek K, Shah D Mol Plant Pathol. 2024; 25(4):e13458.

PMID: 38619888 PMC: 11018249. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.13458.


References
1.
Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sunkara S, Bhatnagar-Panwar M, Waliyar F, Sharma K . Biotechnological advances for combating Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin contamination in crops. Plant Sci. 2015; 234:119-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.02.009. View

2.
Bhatnagar M, Prasad K, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Narasu M, Waliyar F, Sharma K . An efficient method for the production of marker-free transgenic plants of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2010; 29(5):495-502. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-010-0838-4. View

3.
Goyal R, Mattoo A . Multitasking antimicrobial peptides in plant development and host defense against biotic/abiotic stress. Plant Sci. 2014; 228:135-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.05.012. View

4.
Sharma K, Bhatnagar-Mathur P . Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Methods Mol Biol. 2006; 343:347-58. DOI: 10.1385/1-59745-130-4:347. View

5.
Verheecke C, Liboz T, Darriet M, Sabaou N, Mathieu F . In vitro interaction of actinomycetes isolates with Aspergillus flavus: impact on aflatoxins B1 and B2 production. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2014; 58(6):597-603. DOI: 10.1111/lam.12233. View