» Articles » PMID: 28972990

The Moral Foundations of Illusory Correlation

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Oct 4
PMID 28972990
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research has studied the relationship between political ideology and cognitive biases, such as the tendency of conservatives to form stronger illusory correlations between negative infrequent behaviors and minority groups. We further explored these findings by studying the relation between illusory correlation and moral values. According to the moral foundations theory, liberals and conservatives differ in the relevance they concede to different moral dimensions: Care, Fairness, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity. Whereas liberals consistently endorse the Care and Fairness foundations more than the Loyalty, Authority and Purity foundations, conservatives tend to adhere to the five foundations alike. In the present study, a group of participants took part in a standard illusory correlation task in which they were presented with randomly ordered descriptions of either desirable or undesirable behaviors attributed to individuals belonging to numerically different majority and minority groups. Although the proportion of desirable and undesirable behaviors was the same in the two groups, participants attributed a higher frequency of undesirable behaviors to the minority group, thus showing the expected illusory correlation effect. Moreover, this effect was specifically associated to our participants' scores in the Loyalty subscale of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. These results emphasize the role of the Loyalty moral foundation in the formation of attitudes towards minorities among conservatives. Our study points out the moral system as a useful fine-grained framework to explore the complex interaction between basic cognitive processes and ideology.

Citing Articles

The more, the merrier: Treatment frequency influences effectiveness perception and further treatment choice.

Barberia I, Blanco F, Rodriguez-Ferreiro J Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 28(2):665-675.

PMID: 33123843 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01832-6.


Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries.

Atari M, Lai M, Dehghani M Proc Biol Sci. 2020; 287(1937):20201201.

PMID: 33081618 PMC: 7661301. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1201.

References
1.
Imhoff R, Erb H . What motivates nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008; 35(3):309-20. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208328166. View

2.
Stern C, West T, Schmitt P . The liberal illusion of uniqueness. Psychol Sci. 2013; 25(1):137-44. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613500796. View

3.
McAdams D, Albaugh M, Farber E, Daniels J, Logan R, Olson B . Family metaphors and moral intuitions: how conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 95(4):978-90. DOI: 10.1037/a0012650. View

4.
Duckitt J, Wagner C, du Plessis I, Birum I . The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 83(1):75-93. View

5.
Graham J, Nosek B, Haidt J . The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12):e50092. PMC: 3520939. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050092. View