» Articles » PMID: 28969631

Women's Experiences Seeking Informal Sector Abortion Services in Cape Town, South Africa: a Descriptive Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Oct 4
PMID 28969631
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In settings where abortion is legally restricted, or permitted but not widely accessible, women face significant barriers to abortion access, sometimes leading them to seek services outside legal facilities. The advent of medication abortion has further increased the prevalence of informal sector abortion. This study investigates the reasons for attempting self-induction, methods used, complications, and sources of information about informal sector abortion, and tests a specific recruitment method which could lead to improved estimates of informal sector abortion prevalence among an at-risk population.

Methods: We recruited women who have sought informal sector abortion services in Cape Town, South Africa using respondent driven sampling (RDS). An initial seed recruiter was responsible for initiating recruitment using a structured coupon system. Participants completed face-to-face questionnaires, which included information about demographics, informal sector abortion seeking, and safe abortion access needs.

Results: We enrolled 42 women, nearly one-third of whom reported they were sex workers. Thirty-four women (81%) reported having had one informal sector abortion within the past 5 years, 14% reported having had two, and 5% reported having had three. These women consumed home remedies, herbal mixtures from traditional healers, or tablets from an unregistered provider. Twelve sought additional care for potential warning signs of complications. Privacy and fear of mistreatment at public sector facilities were among the main reported reasons for attempting informal sector abortion. Most women (67%) cited other community members as their source of information about informal sector abortion; posted signs and fliers in public spaces also served as an important source of information.

Conclusions: Women are attempting informal sector abortion because they seek privacy and fear mistreatment and stigma in health facilities. Some were unaware how or where to seek formal sector services, or believed the cost was too high. Many informal methods are ineffective and unsafe, leading to potential warning signs of complications and continued pregnancy. Sex workers may be at particular risk of unsafe abortion. Based on these results, it is essential that future studies sample women outside of the formal health sector. The use of innovative sampling methods would greatly improve our knowledge about informal sector abortion in South Africa.

Citing Articles

Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes on termination of pregnancy in eThekwini.

Singh T, Naidoo K S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2025; 67(1):e1-e8.

PMID: 39935158 PMC: 11886466. DOI: 10.4102/safp.v67i1.6005.


A global scoping review of the circumstances of care seeking for abortion later in pregnancy.

Jacobson L, Darney B, Johnston H, Ganatra B PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(12):e0003965.

PMID: 39636911 PMC: 11620362. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003965.


Factors influencing abortion care-seeking outside of formal healthcare settings: lived experiences from Rwandan young women.

Ndayisenga J, Yamuragiye A, Oudshoorn A, Katende G, Nkurunziza A, Tengera O BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):578.

PMID: 39468559 PMC: 11520060. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03410-7.


Searching for Needles in a Haystack: Exploring Alternative Operational Approaches to Classify the Safety of Induced Abortions Using Respondent-Driven Sampling Data From Two Sub-Saharan African Settings.

Owolabi O, Rossier C, Compaore R, Kim C, Ganatra B, Ouedraogo R Stud Fam Plann. 2024; 55(4):251-268.

PMID: 39325587 PMC: 11636774. DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12276.


"I always know she cannot betray me." Disclosure of abortion and methods of abortion used in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya.

Ouedraogo R, Wanjiru S, Zan M, Rossier C, Owolabi O, Athero S PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(7):e0003252.

PMID: 39018278 PMC: 11253939. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003252.


References
1.
Chadwick R, Cooper D, Harries J . Narratives of distress about birth in South African public maternity settings: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2014; 30(7):862-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.12.014. View

2.
Heckathorn D . SNOWBALL VERSUS RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING. Sociol Methodol. 2012; 41(1):355-366. PMC: 3250988. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01244.x. View

3.
Magnani R, Sabin K, Saidel T, Heckathorn D . Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005; 19 Suppl 2:S67-72. DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000172879.20628.e1. View

4.
Ostrach B, Cheyney M . Navigating Social and Institutional Obstacles: Low-Income Women Seeking Abortion. Qual Health Res. 2014; 24(7):1006-1017. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314540218. View

5.
Zurbriggen R, Keefe-Oates B, Gerdts C . Accompaniment of second-trimester abortions: the model of the feminist Socorrista network of Argentina. Contraception. 2017; 97(2):108-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.170. View