» Articles » PMID: 28965278

The Value of Delaying HCG Administration to Enable Maturation of Medium-sized Follicles in Patients Undergoing Superovulation for IVF/ICSI

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Oct 2
PMID 28965278
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine whether continued stimulation of mature follicles to allow "catch up" growth of medium-sized follicles in assisted reproductive technology compromises the clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth (LBR) rates in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed 200 first IVF ± ICSI cycles out of a total of 340 cycles with complete data. Women underwent stimulation protocols with gonadotropins (Gn) and GnRH antagonist. Treatment cycles were divided into two groups (Gp): hCG administration delayed despite the presence of two mature follicles, defined as ≥ 18 mm [Gp1, n = 79] and hCG administration given when there were two mature follicles [Gp2, n = 121].

Results: The patients in Gp1 were significantly younger than those in Gp2 [32.9 (4.5) vs. 34.3 (4.8), p = 0.04] and needed a median of one more day of superovulation before ovulation was triggered with hCG. The extra days was associated with the use of 450 [75-2025] more Gn, such that at the time the hCG was administered, patient's in group 1 had developed significantly greater number of follicles ≥ 18 mm [mean (SD), 4.9 (1.8) vs. 3.4 (1.7), p < 0.0001]. The clinical pregnancy (48.1 vs. 38.0%, [OR (95% CI)] [1.6 (1.0-2.5), p = 0.09]) and live birth (43.0 vs. 35.5%, [1.4 (0.9-2.3), p = 0.21]) rates per cycle started were not significantly different between the two groups. Forward stepwise logistic regression showed that only maternal age (p = 0.04) influenced clinical pregnancy rates (OR = 0.88, CI 0.78-0.99) and only the number of days for superovulation influenced live birth rates (OR = 0.65, CI 0.486-0.869).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that delaying hCG administration to allow further growth of the medium-sized follicles added further days of superovulation and cost without improvement in CPR and LBR.

Citing Articles

Increasing dominant follicular proportion was associated with adverse IVF/ICSI outcomes in low-prognosis women undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective cohort study.

Xie Q, Jiang W, Wei Y, Ni D, Yan N, Yang Y J Ovarian Res. 2024; 17(1):179.

PMID: 39217358 PMC: 11365273. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01502-4.


Meta-analysis of trigger timing in normal responders undergoing GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol.

Xie Q, Ni D, Chen S, Zhang W, Wang J, Ling X J Ovarian Res. 2024; 17(1):56.

PMID: 38444028 PMC: 10913352. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01379-3.

References
1.
Felberbaum R, Albano C, Ludwig M, Riethmuller-Winzen H, Grigat M, Devroey P . Ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction with HMG and concomitant midcycle administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix according to the multiple dose protocol: a prospective uncontrolled phase III study. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(5):1015-20. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1015. View

2.
Tremellen K, Lane M . Avoidance of weekend oocyte retrievals during GnRH antagonist treatment by simple advancement or delay of hCG administration does not adversely affect IVF live birth outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(5):1219-24. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq059. View

3.
Abdalla H, Baber R, Leonard T, Kirkland A, Mitchell A, Power M . Timed oocyte collection in an assisted conception programme using GnRH analogue. Hum Reprod. 1989; 4(8):927-30. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137014. View

4.
Albano C, Felberbaum R, Smitz J, Riethmuller-Winzen H, Engel J, Diedrich K . Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin. European Cetrorelix Study Group. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(3):526-31. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.526. View

5.
de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla J, Ferraretti A, Korsak V . Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(8):1851-62. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq124. View