» Articles » PMID: 28963046

Introducing a Simple Method of Maxillary Sinus Volume Assessment Based on Linear Dimensions

Overview
Journal Ann Anat
Date 2017 Oct 1
PMID 28963046
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Measuring sinus volume in a general practice clinic is a complex and time-consuming procedure, requiring experience in the use of radiological methods In the presented research, the automatically estimated maxillary sinus volume was compared with maxillary sinus volume assessed with mathematical formulas used to calculate the volume of spheres and pyramids. The starting point for the statistical analysis were specific measurements of the sinuses. We wanted to discover which geometric shape has the volume that is nearest to the automatically estimated volume. The study was performed using samples of CT scans of pediatric patients age 1-17. The dimensions (maximal width, maximal height, maximal length) were used for manual calculations. For the automatic volume calculation, the CT Image Segmentation algorithm (Syngo Via for Oncology, Siemens) was used. Pearson's correlation coefficient was applied to analyse the interrelationship between automatically and manually calculated volume of maxillary sinus. It was statistically established that the "sphere", "pyramid" and "mean" manually calculated maxillary sinus volume were accurate and strongly correlated with the automatically estimated maxillary sinus volume. The volume of the sphere corresponds better with the automatic measurements than the volume of the pyramid. The variations are significant and they were made reliable with the application of a statistical test. It is quick and easy to calculate the maxillary sinus volume based on its linear dimensions instead of applying advanced software. The manual method for maxillary sinus volume calculation requires three linear measurements of the sinus (length, width, and height) and can be recommended if the automatically estimated volume cannot be obtained.

Citing Articles

Estimating Maxillary Sinus Volume Using Smartphone Camera.

Meliadis C, Feng E, Johnson E, Zhu W, Gopi P, Mohan V IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2025; 6:256-260.

PMID: 39906271 PMC: 11793482. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3516320.


Relationship of Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasal Septum Deviation: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Betancourt A, Martinez Somoza L, Romero Mesa C, Tozum T, Mourao C, Shibli J Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535067 PMC: 10969206. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060647.


Volumetric study of the maxillary sinus in patients with sinus pathology.

Perez Sayans M, Suarez Quintanilla J, Chamorro Petronacci C, Suarez Penaranda J, Lopez Jornet P, Gomez Garcia F PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234915.

PMID: 32555640 PMC: 7302704. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234915.


The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy.

Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019; 48(8):20190205.

PMID: 31386556 PMC: 6951102. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190205.


The Association between Maxillary Sinus Dimensions and Midface Parameters during Human Postnatal Growth.

Przystanska A, Kulczyk T, Rewekant A, Sroka A, Jonczyk-Potoczna K, Gawriolek K Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:6391465.

PMID: 29862281 PMC: 5976946. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6391465.