Dopamine, Inference, and Uncertainty
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The hypothesis that the phasic dopamine response reports a reward prediction error has become deeply entrenched. However, dopamine neurons exhibit several notable deviations from this hypothesis. A coherent explanation for these deviations can be obtained by analyzing the dopamine response in terms of Bayesian reinforcement learning. The key idea is that prediction errors are modulated by probabilistic beliefs about the relationship between cues and outcomes, updated through Bayesian inference. This account can explain dopamine responses to inferred value in sensory preconditioning, the effects of cue preexposure (latent inhibition), and adaptive coding of prediction errors when rewards vary across orders of magnitude. We further postulate that orbitofrontal cortex transforms the stimulus representation through recurrent dynamics, such that a simple error-driven learning rule operating on the transformed representation can implement the Bayesian reinforcement learning update.
Explaining dopamine through prediction errors and beyond.
Gershman S, Assad J, Datta S, Linderman S, Sabatini B, Uchida N Nat Neurosci. 2024; 27(9):1645-1655.
PMID: 39054370 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-024-01705-4.
Synthetic surprise as the foundation of the psychedelic experience.
De Filippo R, Schmitz D Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024; 157:105538.
PMID: 38220035 PMC: 10839673. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105538.
Mikus N, Eisenegger C, Mathys C, Clark L, Muller U, Robbins T Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):4049.
PMID: 37422466 PMC: 10329681. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39823-5.
Learning temporal relationships between symbols with Laplace Neural Manifolds.
Howard M, Esfahani Z, Le B, Sederberg P ArXiv. 2023; .
PMID: 36866224 PMC: 9980275.
The interpretation of computational model parameters depends on the context.
Eckstein M, Master S, Xia L, Dahl R, Wilbrecht L, Collins A Elife. 2022; 11.
PMID: 36331872 PMC: 9635876. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.75474.