» Articles » PMID: 28955425

Intra-abdominal Fat: Comparison of Computed Tomography Fat Segmentation and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy

Overview
Journal Malawi Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Sep 29
PMID 28955425
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intra-abdominal fat is an important factor in determining the metabolic syndrome/insulin resistance, and thus the risk of diabetes and ischaemic heart disease. Computed Tomography (CT) fat segmentation represents a defined method of quantifying intra-abdominal fat, with attendant radiation risks. Bioimpedance spectroscopy may offer a method of assessment without any risks to the patients. A comparison is made of these two methods.

Methods: This was a preliminary study of the utility of multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy of the mid abdomen as a measure of intra-abdominal fat, by comparison with fat segmentation of an abdominal CT scan in the -30 to -190 HU range.

Results: There was a significant (P < 0.01) correlation between intra-abdominal fat and mid-upper arm circumference, as well as the bioimpedance parameter, the R/S ratio. Multivariate analysis showed that these were the only independant variables and allowed the derivation of a formula to estimate intra-abdominal fat: IAF = 0.02 × MAC - 0.757 × R/S + 0.036.

Conclusions: Circumabdominal bioimpedance spectroscopy may prove a useful method of assessing intra-abdominal fat, and may be suitable for use in studies to enhance other measures of body composition, such as mid-upper arm circumference.

Citing Articles

The association of lipid accumulation product with inflammatory parameters and mortality: evidence from a large population-based study.

Chi Y, Zhang Y, Lin H, Zhou S, Jia G, Wen W Front Epidemiol. 2025; 4:1503261.

PMID: 39967714 PMC: 11832662. DOI: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1503261.


Associations between visceral adipose tissue estimates produced by near-infrared spectroscopy, mobile anthropometrics, and traditional body composition assessments and estimates derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Graybeal A, Brandner C, Tinsley G, Haynes H, Stavres J Br J Nutr. 2022; 130(3):525-535.

PMID: 36268732 PMC: 10331432. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114522003488.


Efficacy of visceral fat estimation by dual bioelectrical impedance analysis in detecting cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Omura-Ohata Y, Son C, Makino H, Koezuka R, Tochiya M, Tamanaha T Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019; 18(1):137.

PMID: 31640702 PMC: 6805489. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-019-0941-y.


Accumulating Data to Optimally Predict Obesity Treatment (ADOPT): Recommendations from the Biological Domain.

Rosenbaum M, Agurs-Collins T, Bray M, Hall K, Hopkins M, Laughlin M Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018; 26 Suppl 2:S25-S34.

PMID: 29575784 PMC: 6945498. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22156.

References
1.
Kim Y, Lee S, Kim T, Park J, Choi S, Kim K . Body fat assessment method using CT images with separation mask algorithm. J Digit Imaging. 2012; 26(2):155-62. PMC: 3597966. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9488-0. View

2.
Jokhi R, Ghule V, Brown B, Anumba D . Reproducibility and repeatability of measuring the electrical impedance of the pregnant human cervix-the effect of probe size and applied pressure. Biomed Eng Online. 2009; 8:10. PMC: 2704213. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-8-10. View

3.
Calabro P, Yeh E . Intra-abdominal adiposity, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk: new insight into global cardiometabolic risk. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2008; 10(1):32-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-008-0008-z. View

4.
Azmi R, Norozi N . A New Markov Random Field Segmentation Method for Breast Lesion Segmentation in MR images. J Med Signals Sens. 2012; 1(3):156-64. PMC: 3347230. View

5.
Despres J, Lemieux I, Bergeron J, Pibarot P, Mathieu P, Larose E . Abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome: contribution to global cardiometabolic risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28(6):1039-49. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.159228. View