» Articles » PMID: 28955103

Our Experience with the Use of Low Cost Mesh in Tension-Free Inguinal Hernioplasty in Northern Ghana

Overview
Journal Ghana Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Sep 29
PMID 28955103
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To describe our experience and success in the use of low cost mesh for the repair of inguinal hernias in consenting adult patients.

Methods: A prospective study was carried out from August 2010 to December 2013 in ten district hospitals across Northern Ghana. The patients were divided into four groups according to Kingsnorth's classification of hernias. Low cost mesh was used to repair uncomplicated groin hernia. Those hernias associated with complications were excluded. We assessed the patients for wound infection, long term incisional pain and recurrence of hernia. The data collected was entered, cleaned, validated and analyzed.

Results: One hundred and eighty-four patients had tension-free repair of their inguinal hernias using non-insecticide impregnated mosquito net mesh. The median age of the patients was 51 years. The male to female ratio was 7:1. Using Kingsnorth's classification, H3 hernias were (62, 33.7%), followed by the H1 group (56, 30.4%). Local anaesthesia was used in 70% and less than 5% had general anaesthesia. The cost of low cost mesh to each patient was calculated to be $ 1.8(GH¢7.2) vs $ 45(GH¢ 180) for commercial mesh of same size. The benefit to the patient and the facility was enormous. Wound hematoma was noticed in 7% while superficial surgical site infection was 3%. No patient reported of long term wound pain. There was no recurrence of hernia.

Conclusion: Low cost mesh such as sterilized mosquito net mesh for use in hernioplasty in resource-limited settings is reasonable, acceptable and cost-effective, it should be widely propagated.

Funding: None declared.

Citing Articles

Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.

Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, Agresta F, Aufenacker T, Berrevoet F BJS Open. 2023; 7(5).

PMID: 37862616 PMC: 10588975. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080.


Study of Operative Outcomes of Hernioplasty Using Mosquito Net Mesh at a Tertiary Hospital.

Chate N, Motiram N, Jogdand B, Birajdar M Cureus. 2022; 14(8):e28525.

PMID: 36185890 PMC: 9514146. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28525.


Adult groin hernia surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ndong A, Tendeng J, Diallo A, Diao M, Sow O, Mawuli S Hernia. 2022; 27(1):157-172.

PMID: 36066755 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02669-9.


Regulatory science for hernia mesh: Current status and future perspectives.

Liu W, Xie Y, Zheng Y, He W, Qiao K, Meng H Bioact Mater. 2020; 6(2):420-432.

PMID: 32995670 PMC: 7490592. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.021.


Alterations in the mechanical, chemical and biocompatibility properties of low-cost polyethylene and polyester meshes after steam sterilization.

Wiessner R, Lorenz R, Gehring A, Kleber T, Benz C, Sander M Hernia. 2020; 24(6):1345-1359.

PMID: 32975699 PMC: 7701087. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02272-w.


References
1.
Koukourou A, Lyon W, Rice J, Wattchow D . Prospective randomized trial of polypropylene mesh compared with nylon darn in inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2001; 88(7):931-4. DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01818.x. View

2.
Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons Jr R, Dunlop D, Gibbs J . Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(18):1819-27. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040093. View

3.
Kingsnorth A . A clinical classification for patients with inguinal hernia. Hernia. 2004; 8(3):283-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-004-0228-3. View

4.
Clarke M, Oppong C, Simmermacher R, Park K, Kurzer M, Vanotoo L . The use of sterilised polyester mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in Ghana. Hernia. 2008; 13(2):155-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-008-0460-3. View

5.
Amid P, SHULMAN A, LICHTENSTEIN I . Open "tension-free" repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique. Eur J Surg. 1996; 162(6):447-53. View