» Articles » PMID: 28948475

Correlation of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography with Clinical Manifestations in Methamphetamine Body Stuffers

Overview
Journal Radiol Med
Specialty Radiology
Date 2017 Sep 27
PMID 28948475
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little is known about methamphetamine body stuffers and correlation of clinical manifestations with imaging studies. Current study was done to determine abdominopelvic computed tomography findings and clinical manifestations in methamphetamine body stuffers. In an IRB-approved routine data base study, demographic characteristics, clinical findings, and CT results of 70 methamphetamine body stuffers were retrieved. According to the clinical manifestations, the patients were categorized into either benign- or severe-outcome group. Also, they were determined to have positive or negative CT results. In the group with positive results, number and place of the baggies were determined, as well. Results of the CT were compared between the two groups. Almost 43% of the patients had positive abdominopelvic CT results. Mean density of the packs was 176.2 ± 152.7 Hounsfield unit. Based on the clinical grounds, 57% of the patients were in the benign- and 33% were in the severe-outcome group. In the benign group, 45% of the patients had positive CTs while in the severe-risk group, this was 40% (p > 0.05). Except variables defined as severe outcome (seizure, intubation, creatinine level, aspartate aminotransferase level, creatine phosphokinase and troponin level), agitation, on-arrival pulse rate, lactate dehydrogenase, bicarbonate, base excess, loss of consciousness and hospitalization period were correlating factors. But in regression analysis, we could not find a significant variable that prognosticate severe outcome. It seems that there is no relationship between the CT findings and clinical manifestations of the methamphetamine body stuffers. Severe outcomes may be observed even in the face of negative CTs.

Citing Articles

Assessment of renal function indexes in methamphetamine or tramadol intoxication adults to the emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amanollahi A, Mehrabi Y, Sedighi M, Basir Ghafouri H, Zahedi A, Shadnia S BMC Emerg Med. 2023; 23(1):89.

PMID: 37568118 PMC: 10416491. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-023-00855-1.


Oral clonazepam versus lorazepam in the treatment of methamphetamine-poisoned children: a pilot clinical trial.

Farnaghi F, Rahmani R, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Zamani N, McDonald R, Gholami N BMC Pediatr. 2020; 20(1):543.

PMID: 33267837 PMC: 7713025. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02441-x.


Dual-energy CT: theoretical principles and clinical applications.

Agostini A, Borgheresi A, Mari A, Floridi C, Bruno F, Carotti M Radiol Med. 2019; 124(12):1281-1295.

PMID: 31792703 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01107-8.

References
1.
June R, Aks S, KEYS N, Wahl M . Medical outcome of cocaine bodystuffers. J Emerg Med. 2000; 18(2):221-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00198-5. View

2.
Marc B, Baud F, AELION M, Gherardi R, BLERY M, Bismuth C . The cocaine body-packer syndrome: evaluation of a method of contrast study of the bowel. J Forensic Sci. 1990; 35(2):345-55. View

3.
Kashani J, Ruha A . Methamphetamine toxicity secondary to intravaginal body stuffing. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2005; 42(7):987-9. DOI: 10.1081/clt-200042554. View

4.
Matsumoto R, Seminerio M, Turner R, Robson M, Nguyen L, Miller D . Methamphetamine-induced toxicity: an updated review on issues related to hyperthermia. Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 144(1):28-40. PMC: 4700537. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.05.001. View

5.
Sporer K, Firestone J . Clinical course of crack cocaine body stuffers. Ann Emerg Med. 1997; 29(5):596-601. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70246-4. View