» Articles » PMID: 28948339

Predicted Osteotomy Planes Are Accurate when Using Patient-specific Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Cadavers: a Descriptive Analysis

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Sep 27
PMID 28948339
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Malalignment of implants is a major source of failure during total knee arthroplasty. To achieve more accurate 3D planning and execution of the osteotomy cuts during surgery, the Signature (Biomet, Warsaw) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was used to produce pin guides for the positioning of the osteotomy blocks by means of computer-aided manufacture based on CT scan images. The research question of this study is: what is the transfer accuracy of osteotomy planes predicted by the Signature PSI system for preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative block-guided pin placement to perform total knee arthroplasty procedures?

Methods: The transfer accuracy achieved by using the Signature PSI system was evaluated by comparing the osteotomy planes predicted preoperatively with the osteotomy planes seen intraoperatively in human cadaveric legs. Outcomes were measured in terms of translational and rotational errors (varus, valgus, flexion, extension and axial rotation) for both tibia and femur osteotomies.

Results: Average translational errors between the osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and the actual osteotomy planes achieved was 0.8 mm (± 0.5 mm) for the tibia and 0.7 mm (± 4.0 mm) for the femur. Average rotational errors in relation to predicted and achieved osteotomy planes were 0.1° (± 1.2°) of varus and 0.4° (± 1.7°) of anterior slope (extension) for the tibia, and 2.8° (± 2.0°) of varus and 0.9° (± 2.7°) of flexion and 1.4° (± 2.2°) of external rotation for the femur.

Conclusion: The similarity between osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and osteotomy planes actually achieved was excellent for the tibia although some discrepancies were seen for the femur. The use of 3D system techniques in TKA surgery can provide accurate intraoperative guidance, especially for patients with deformed bone, tailored to individual patients and ensure better placement of the implant.

Citing Articles

Flexion contracture can cause component mismatch in the Prophecy preoperative patient-specific instrumentation for Evolution medial-pivot knee system.

Hiyama S, Takahashi T, Handa M, Takeshita K SICOT J. 2024; 10:12.

PMID: 38592306 PMC: 11003457. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2024009.


The Bony Resection Accuracy with Patient-Specific Instruments during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series Study.

Yuan L, Yang B, Wang X, Sun B, Zhang K, Yan Y Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:8674847.

PMID: 33644230 PMC: 7902140. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8674847.


Clinical Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Patient-Specific Cutting Guides.

Calbiyik M Med Sci Monit. 2017; 23:6168-6173.

PMID: 29287060 PMC: 5755952. DOI: 10.12659/msm.908213.

References
1.
Aslam N, Lo S, Nagarajah K, Pasapula C, Akmal M . Reliability of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005; 70(6):560-4. View

2.
Conteduca F, Iorio R, Mazza D, Caperna L, Bolle G, Argento G . Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 21(10):2194-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2098-z. View

3.
Kerens B, Boonen B, Schotanus M, Kort N . Patient-specific guide for revision of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: beneficial first results of a new operating technique performed on 10 patients. Acta Orthop. 2013; 84(2):165-9. PMC: 3639337. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2013.785908. View

4.
Klatt B, Goyal N, Austin M, Hozack W . Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(1):26-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.001. View

5.
Ng V, DeClaire J, Berend K, Gulick B, Lombardi Jr A . Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 470(1):99-107. PMC: 3237987. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1996-6. View