» Articles » PMID: 28945824

Mammalian Odorant Receptor Tuning Breadth Persists Across Distinct Odorant Panels

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Sep 26
PMID 28945824
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The molecular receptive range (MRR) of a mammalian odorant receptor (OR) is the set of odorant structures that activate the OR, while the distribution of these odorant structures across odor space is the tuning breadth of the OR. Variation in tuning breadth is thought to be an important property of ORs, with the MRRs of these receptors varying from narrowly to broadly tuned. However, defining the tuning breadth of an OR is a technical challenge. For practical reasons, a screening panel that broadly covers odor space must be limited to sparse coverage of the many potential structures in that space. When screened with such a panel, ORs with different odorant specificities, but equal tuning breadths, might appear to have different tuning breadths due to chance. We hypothesized that ORs would maintain their tuning breadths across distinct odorant panels. We constructed a new screening panel that was broadly distributed across an estimated odor space and contained compounds distinct from previous panels. We used this new screening panel to test several murine ORs that were previously characterized as having different tuning breadths. ORs were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and assayed by two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology. MOR256-17, an OR previously characterized as broadly tuned, responded to nine novel compounds from our new screening panel that were structurally diverse and broadly dispersed across an estimated odor space. MOR256-22, an OR previously characterized as narrowly tuned, responded to a single novel compound that was structurally similar to a previously known ligand for this receptor. MOR174-9, a well-characterized receptor with a narrowly tuned MRR, did not respond to any novel compounds in our new panel. These results support the idea that variation in tuning breadth among these three ORs is not an artifact of the screening protocol, but is an intrinsic property of the receptors.

Citing Articles

Odor Discrimination by Lipid Membranes.

Lowry T, Kusi-Appiah A, Fadool D, Lenhert S Membranes (Basel). 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36837654 PMC: 9962961. DOI: 10.3390/membranes13020151.


More than meets the AI: The possibilities and limits of machine learning in olfaction.

Barwich A, Lloyd E Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:981294.

PMID: 36117640 PMC: 9475214. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.981294.

References
1.
Nakamura T, Gold G . A cyclic nucleotide-gated conductance in olfactory receptor cilia. Nature. 1987; 325(6103):442-4. DOI: 10.1038/325442a0. View

2.
Nara K, Saraiva L, Ye X, Buck L . A large-scale analysis of odor coding in the olfactory epithelium. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(25):9179-91. PMC: 3758579. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1282-11.2011. View

3.
Mombaerts P, Wang F, Dulac C, CHAO S, Nemes A, Mendelsohn M . Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell. 1996; 87(4):675-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81387-2. View

4.
Uezono Y, Bradley J, Min C, McCarty N, Quick M, Riordan J . Receptors that couple to 2 classes of G proteins increase cAMP and activate CFTR expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Recept Channels. 1993; 1(3):233-41. View

5.
Serizawa S, Miyamichi K, Nakatani H, Suzuki M, Saito M, Yoshihara Y . Negative feedback regulation ensures the one receptor-one olfactory neuron rule in mouse. Science. 2003; 302(5653):2088-94. DOI: 10.1126/science.1089122. View