» Articles » PMID: 28936618

Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Sep 23
PMID 28936618
Citations 78
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physicians routinely encounter diagnostic uncertainty in practice. Despite its impact on health care utilization, costs and error, measurement of diagnostic uncertainty is poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review to describe how diagnostic uncertainty is defined and measured in medical practice.

Methods: We searched OVID Medline and PsycINFO databases from inception until May 2017 using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Additional search strategies included manual review of references identified in the primary search, use of a topic-specific database (AHRQ-PSNet) and expert input. We specifically focused on articles that (1) defined diagnostic uncertainty; (2) conceptualized diagnostic uncertainty in terms of its sources, complexity of its attributes or strategies for managing it; or (3) attempted to measure diagnostic uncertainty.

Key Results: We identified 123 articles for full review, none of which defined diagnostic uncertainty. Three attributes of diagnostic uncertainty were relevant for measurement: (1) it is a subjective perception experienced by the clinician; (2) it has the potential to impact diagnostic evaluation-for example, when inappropriately managed, it can lead to diagnostic delays; and (3) it is dynamic in nature, changing with time. Current methods for measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medical practice include: (1) asking clinicians about their perception of uncertainty (surveys and qualitative interviews), (2) evaluating the patient-clinician encounter (such as by reviews of medical records, transcripts of patient-clinician communication and observation), and (3) experimental techniques (patient vignette studies).

Conclusions: The term "diagnostic uncertainty" lacks a clear definition, and there is no comprehensive framework for its measurement in medical practice. Based on review findings, we propose that diagnostic uncertainty be defined as a "subjective perception of an inability to provide an accurate explanation of the patient's health problem." Methodological advancements in measuring diagnostic uncertainty can improve our understanding of diagnostic decision-making and inform interventions to reduce diagnostic errors and overuse of health care resources.

Citing Articles

Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review.

Tattan M, Rosmalen J, Hanssen D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317236.

PMID: 39869577 PMC: 11771906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317236.


It's Not Written All Over My Face: Constructing Chronic Pain as Invisible in Pain Clinic Consultations and Interviews.

Declercq J Clin J Pain. 2025; 41(3).

PMID: 39782005 PMC: 11801457. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001273.


The social experience of uncertainty: a qualitative analysis of emergency department care for suspected pneumonia for the design of decision support.

Taber P, Weir C, Zickmund S, Rutter E, Butler J, Jones B BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):386.

PMID: 39695584 PMC: 11657753. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02805-8.


Defining, exploring the sources and expressing post-mortem diagnostic uncertainty.

Van Den Bogaert W, Alders L, Wuestenbergs J, Dequeker E, Van de Voorde W Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024; .

PMID: 39627482 DOI: 10.1007/s12024-024-00919-z.


Unclear Trajectory and Uncertain Benefit: Creating a Lexicon for Clinical Uncertainty in Patients with Critical or Advanced Illness Using a Delphi Consensus Process.

McGowan S, Corrales-Martinez M, Brender T, Smith A, Kim S, Harrison K Med Decis Making. 2024; 45(1):34-44.

PMID: 39559986 PMC: 11645224. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241293446.


References
1.
Kennedy A . Managing uncertainty in diagnostic practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015; 23(5):959-963. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12328. View

2.
Shinkins B, Perera R . Diagnostic uncertainty: dichotomies are not the answer. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(608):122-3. PMC: 3582949. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X664090. View

3.
SAURER A, Fischer W, Dayer P, Fabre J . [Ordering laboratory tests: their quantity and causes of variations among physicians]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1986; 116(35):1176-83. View

4.
Lossos I, Israeli A, Zajicek G, Berry E . Diagnosis deferred--the clinical spectrum of diagnostic uncertainty. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42(7):649-57. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90008-5. View

5.
Serbic D, Pincus T . Diagnostic uncertainty and recall bias in chronic low back pain. Pain. 2014; 155(8):1540-1546. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.04.030. View