» Articles » PMID: 28936124

The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Ambulant Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Thromb J
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Sep 23
PMID 28936124
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). PICCs are increasingly utilised in the management of cancer patients, a group which carries both additional risks for vascular thromboembolism as well as for complex morbidity. We analysed a cohort of cancer patients subjected to PICC insertion in a single cancer centre for the incidence of all-type vascular thromboembolism (VTE) and investigated relative risk factors.

Methods: In this clinical audit, the records of patients referred for PICC insertion in our centre in the period between 1/1/2011 and 1/4/2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes investigated were a) PICC-related deep vein thrombosis (PRDVT) and b) distant VTE (lower limb DVT and pulmonary embolism). 4Fr single lumen PICCs were placed in all patients. The Kaplan Meier method was used to study time from PICC insertion to PRDVT/VTE. Survival curves were compared using the log rank method. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to assess local, distant and combined endpoints.

Results: Four hundred ninety patients were included in the analysis of which 27 (5.5%) developed a PRDVT. Statistically significant risk factors for developing PRDVT in multivariate analysis included more than one attempt for insertion (OR 2.61, 95%CI: 1.12-6.05) and the use of fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.27, 95%CI 1.3-14.07). Twenty-six patients developed a distant VTE. Male gender was the only significant risk factor for distant VTE. When all-type VTE were considered together fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.63-12.61), male gender (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.04-3.93) and white cell count (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.26) were statistically significant as risk factors in this analysis.

Conclusions: This is a large study of VTE following PICC insertion in cancer patients which also looks at the rate of distant VTE. The observed PRDVT incidence is comparable with available literature. Fluoropyrimidine containing chemotherapy and more than one attempt for PICC insertion were independent predictors of PICC-associated VTE whilst the former remained an independent predictor of all-type VTE. Anticoagulation did not prevent thrombotic events in this cohort.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for PICC-related venous thrombosis in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Hu Z, Luo M, He R, Wu Z, Fan Y, Li J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4654.

PMID: 39920370 PMC: 11805956. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89260-1.


A Comprehensive Review of Catheter-Related Thrombosis.

Lopez-Rubio M, Lago-Rodriguez M, Ordieres-Ortega L, Oblitas C, Moragon-Ledesma S, Alonso-Beato R J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768741 PMC: 11728333. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247818.


Role of the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet score in predicting thrombophlebitis among patients undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter.

Shi Y, Zhan Z, Ju M, Yang L, Chen X, Liang L Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(49):e40520.

PMID: 39654256 PMC: 11630945. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040520.


Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.

Curtis K, Gough K, Krishnasamy M, Tarasenko E, Hill G, Keogh S BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):498.

PMID: 38641574 PMC: 11027380. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.


Appraising the quality standard of clinical practice guidelines related to central venous catheter-related thrombosis prevention: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.

Zhang J, Wu Y, Zhang S, Yao W, Bu F, Wang A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e074854.

PMID: 38471679 PMC: 10936513. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074854.


References
1.
Sharp R, Cummings M, Fielder A, Mikocka-Walus A, Grech C, Esterman A . The catheter to vein ratio and rates of symptomatic venous thromboembolism in patients with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): a prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52(3):677-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.12.002. View

2.
Starling N, Rao S, Cunningham D, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F . Thromboembolism in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer treated with anthracycline, platinum, and fluoropyrimidine combination chemotherapy: a report from the UK National Cancer Research Institute Upper Gastrointestinal Clinical Studies.... J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(23):3786-93. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4274. View

3.
Meyer B . Developing an alternative workflow model for peripherally inserted central catheter placement. J Infus Nurs. 2012; 35(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e31823bc8fd. View

4.
Fallouh N, McGuirk H, Flanders S, Chopra V . Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-associated Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Narrative Review. Am J Med. 2015; 128(7):722-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.027. View

5.
Akl E, Ramly E, Kahale L, Yosuico V, Barba M, Sperati F . Anticoagulation for people with cancer and central venous catheters. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (10):CD006468. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006468.pub5. View