» Articles » PMID: 28936029

Silicon Nanoporous Membranes As a Rigorous Platform for Validation of Biomolecular Transport Models

Overview
Journal J Memb Sci
Date 2017 Sep 23
PMID 28936029
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), a technology that resulted from significant innovation in semiconductor fabrication, have recently been applied to the development of silicon nanopore membranes (SNM). In contrast to membranes fabricated from polymeric materials, SNM exhibit slit-shaped pores, monodisperse pore size, constant surface porosity, zero pore overlap, and sub-micron thickness. This development in membrane fabrication is applied herein for the validation of the XDLVO (extended Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek) theory of membrane transport within the context of hemofiltration. In this work, the XDLVO model has been derived for the unique slit pore structure of SNM. Beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), a clinically relevant "middle molecular weight" solute in kidney disease, is highlighted in this study as the solute of interest. In order to determine interaction parameters within the XDLVO model for B2M and SNM, goniometric measurements were conducted, yielding a Hamaker constant of 4.61× 10 J and an acid-base Gibbs free energy at contact of 41 mJ/m. The XDLVO model was combined with existing models for membrane sieving, with predictions of the refined model in good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, the results show a significant difference between the XDLVO model and the simpler steric predictions typically applied in membrane transport. The refined model can be used as a tool to tailor membrane chemistry and maximize sieving or rejection of different biomolecules.

Citing Articles

Advances in hemodialysis therapy.

Thajudeen B, Issa D, Roy-Chaudhury P Fac Rev. 2023; 12:12.

PMID: 37284495 PMC: 10241346. DOI: 10.12703/r/12-12.


Anti-Pectin Fouling Performance of Dopamine and (3-Aminopropy) Triethoxysilane-Coated PVDF Ultrafiltration Membrane.

Lu D, Liu H, Tang Z, Wang M, Song Z, Zhu H Membranes (Basel). 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 36005654 PMC: 9415628. DOI: 10.3390/membranes12080740.


Highly Permeable MoS Nanosheet Porous Membrane for Organic Matter Removal.

Arshad F, Aubry C, Zou L ACS Omega. 2022; 7(2):2419-2428.

PMID: 35071929 PMC: 8772329. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06480.


Innovations in dialysis membranes for improved kidney replacement therapy.

Geremia I, Stamatialis D Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020; 16(10):550-551.

PMID: 32322085 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-020-0293-6.


Membrane innovation: closer to native kidneys.

Storr M, Ward R Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 33(suppl_3):iii22-iii27.

PMID: 30281130 PMC: 6168921. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy228.


References
1.
BECKER J, Reeke Jr G . Three-dimensional structure of beta 2-microglobulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985; 82(12):4225-9. PMC: 397969. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4225. View

2.
Datta S, Conlisk A, Kanani D, Zydney A, Fissell W, Roy S . Characterizing the surface charge of synthetic nanomembranes by the streaming potential method. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2010; 348(1):85-95. PMC: 2900191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.017. View

3.
Kim S, Feinberg B, Kant R, Chui B, Goldman K, Park J . Diffusive Silicon Nanopore Membranes for Hemodialysis Applications. PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0159526. PMC: 4954641. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159526. View

4.
Kanduc M, Schlaich A, Schneck E, Netz R . Hydration repulsion between membranes and polar surfaces: simulation approaches versus continuum theories. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014; 208:142-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.001. View

5.
Fissell W, Roy S, Davenport A . Achieving more frequent and longer dialysis for the majority: wearable dialysis and implantable artificial kidney devices. Kidney Int. 2013; 84(2):256-64. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2012.466. View