» Articles » PMID: 28935936

Evidence of Auditory Insensitivity to Vocalization Frequencies in Two Frogs

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Sep 23
PMID 28935936
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The emergence and maintenance of animal communication systems requires the co-evolution of signal and receiver. Frogs and toads rely heavily on acoustic communication for coordinating reproduction and typically have ears tuned to the dominant frequency of their vocalizations, allowing discrimination from background noise and heterospecific calls. However, we present here evidence that two anurans, Brachycephalus ephippium and B. pitanga, are insensitive to the sound of their own calls. Both species produce advertisement calls outside their hearing sensitivity range and their inner ears are partly undeveloped, which accounts for their lack of high-frequency sensitivity. If unheard by the intended receivers, calls are not beneficial to the emitter and should be selected against because of the costs associated with signal production. We suggest that protection against predators conferred by their high toxicity might help to explain why calling has not yet disappeared, and that visual communication may have replaced auditory in these colourful, diurnal frogs.

Citing Articles

Among the world's smallest vertebrates: a new miniaturized flea-toad (Brachycephalidae) from the Atlantic rainforest.

Toledo L, Botelho L, Carrasco-Medina A, Gray J, Ernetti J, Gama J PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18265.

PMID: 39469590 PMC: 11514764. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18265.


Size matters: individual variation in auditory sensitivity may influence sexual selection in Pacific treefrogs (Pseudacris regilla).

Velez A, Sandoval S J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024; 210(5):771-784.

PMID: 38367051 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-024-01690-w.


Hidden shifts in allometry scaling between sound production and perception in anurans.

Maria B, Tonini J, Reboucas R, Toledo L PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16322.

PMID: 37941929 PMC: 10629387. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16322.


Comment on 'Parasite defensive limb movements enhance acoustic signal attraction in male little torrent frogs'.

Anderson N, Preininger D, Fuxjager M Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37812202 PMC: 10561974. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89134.


Ontogeny of the middle ear and auditory sensitivity in the Natterjack toad (Epidalea calamita).

Lauridsen T, Christensen-Dalsgaard J J Exp Biol. 2022; 225(21).

PMID: 36268787 PMC: 9687611. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.244759.


References
1.
Thevenaz P, Ruttimann U, Unser M . A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2008; 7(1):27-41. DOI: 10.1109/83.650848. View

2.
Halfwerk W, Jones P, Taylor R, Ryan M, Page R . Risky ripples allow bats and frogs to eavesdrop on a multisensory sexual display. Science. 2014; 343(6169):413-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1244812. View

3.
Grosse-Wilde E, Stieber R, Forstner M, Krieger J, Wicher D, Hansson B . Sex-specific odorant receptors of the tobacco hornworm manduca sexta. Front Cell Neurosci. 2010; 4. PMC: 2922936. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2010.00022. View

4.
Nali R, Zamudio K, Haddad C, Prado C . Size-dependent selective mechanisms on males and females and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in frogs. Am Nat. 2014; 184(6):727-40. DOI: 10.1086/678455. View

5.
Hopkins C . Eelectric communication in fish. Am Sci. 1974; 62(4):426-37. View