» Articles » PMID: 28933010

Economic Evaluation of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adults

Overview
Date 2017 Sep 22
PMID 28933010
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Dupilumab significantly improves signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis (AD), including pruritus, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and health-related quality of life versus placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. Since the cost-effectiveness of dupilumab has not been evaluated, the objective of this analysis was to estimate a value-based price range in which dupilumab would be considered cost-effective compared with supportive care (SC) for treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in an adult population.

Methods: A health economic model was developed to evaluate from the US payer perspective the long-term costs and benefits of dupilumab treatment administered every other week (q2w). Dupilumab q2w was compared with SC; robustness of assumptions and results were tested using sensitivity and scenario analyses. Clinical data were derived from the dupilumab LIBERTY AD SOLO trials; healthcare use and cost data were from health insurance claims histories of adult patients with AD. The annual price of maintenance therapy with dupilumab to be considered cost-effective was estimated for decision thresholds of US$100,000 and $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

Results: In the base case, the annual maintenance price for dupilumab therapy to be considered cost-effective would be $28,770 at a $100,000 per QALY gained threshold, and $39,940 at a $150,000 threshold. Results were generally robust to parameter variations in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Dupilumab q2w compared with SC is cost-effective for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in US adults at an annual price of maintenance therapy in the range of $29,000-$40,000 at the $100,000-$150,000 per QALY thresholds.

Funding: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Citing Articles

Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database.

Liu J, Desai K, Teng C, Sturm D, Stockbower G, Patadia H Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025; 17:69-77.

PMID: 39931253 PMC: 11809233. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S506043.


Effectiveness of Dupilumab Treatment to Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kim J, Kim D, Hwang S J Rhinol. 2024; 30(2):62-68.

PMID: 39664879 PMC: 11524354. DOI: 10.18787/jr.2023.00029.


Cost-Effectiveness Study of Difamilast 1% for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adult Japanese Patients.

Nakahara T, Noto S, Matsukawa M, Takeda H, Zhang Y, Kondo T Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(11):3113-3132.

PMID: 39487325 PMC: 11557786. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01300-2.


Impact of Incorporating Future Mandatory Price Reductions with Generic Drug Entry on the Cost-Effectiveness of New Drugs: A Policy Simulation Study of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis Treatment.

Kim M, Quan G, Noh Y, Hong S Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 38727495 PMC: 11083512. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12090938.


Abrocitinib, tralokinumab and upadacitinib for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Edwards S, Karner C, Jhita T, Barton S, Marceniuk G, Yiu Z Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(4):1-113.

PMID: 38343072 PMC: 11017148. DOI: 10.3310/LEXB9006.


References
1.
Eichenfield L, Tom W, Berger T, Krol A, Paller A, Schwarzenberger K . Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 71(1):116-32. PMC: 4326095. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.023. View

2.
Gittler J, Shemer A, Suarez-Farinas M, Fuentes-Duculan J, Gulewicz K, Wang C . Progressive activation of T(H)2/T(H)22 cytokines and selective epidermal proteins characterizes acute and chronic atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130(6):1344-54. PMC: 3991245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.012. View

3.
Roekevisch E, Spuls P, Kuester D, Limpens J, Schmitt J . Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 133(2):429-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.049. View

4.
Woolacott N, Bravo Vergel Y, Hawkins N, Kainth A, Khadjesari Z, Misso K . Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006; 10(31):iii-iv, xiii-xvi, 1-239. DOI: 10.3310/hta10310. View

5.
Ring J, Alomar A, Bieber T, Deleuran M, Fink-Wagner A, Gelmetti C . Guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) Part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012; 26(9):1176-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04636.x. View