» Articles » PMID: 28932150

Comparison of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time Using Hand Files and Two Rotary File Systems in Primary Molars: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Eur J Dent
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Sep 22
PMID 28932150
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In permanent dentition, different rotary systems are used for canal cleaning and shaping. Rotary instrumentation in pediatric dentistry is an emerging concept. A very few studies have compared the efficiency of rotary instrumentation for canal preparation in primary teeth. Hence, this study was performed to compare the obturation quality and instrumentation time of two rotary files systems - Protaper, Mtwo with hand files in primary molars.

Materials And Methods: Forty-five primary mandibular molars were randomly allotted to one of the three groups. Instrumentation was done using K-files in Group 1; Protaper in Group 2; and Mtwo in Group 3. Instrumentation time was recorded. The canal filling quality was assessed as underfill, optimal fill, and overfill. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square, ANOVA, and Tukey test.

Results: No significant difference was observed in the quality of obturation among three groups. Intergroup comparison of the instrumentation time showed a statistically significant difference between the three groups.

Conclusion: The use of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth results in marked reduction in the instrumentation time and improves the quality of obturation.

Citing Articles

Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Rotary and Hand File Systems in Terms of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time among Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Gala U, Kalaskar R, Vinay V, Joshi S, Doiphode A Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 17(8):962-969.

PMID: 39372345 PMC: 11451864. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2950.


Knowledge, Awareness, and Use of Stainless-Steel Crowns Among Dental Professionals in Sana'a City, Yemen.

Al-Arwali S, Al-Haddad K, Zabara A, Al Ghwainem A, Alqarni A, AlGomaiah M Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e945948.

PMID: 39308013 PMC: 11429049. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945948.


Comparative Evaluation of Single Rotary File System and Sequential Multi-file Rotary Systems on Time for Biomechanical Preparation and Obturation Quality in Single-visit Pulpectomy Protocol: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shetty B, Singh R, Patil V, Tirupathi S, Nene K, Rathi N Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 16(Suppl 3):247-252.

PMID: 38268640 PMC: 10804288. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2685.


Assessment of clinical and radiographic efficiency of manual and pediatric rotary file systems in primary root canal preparation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Hadwa S, Ghouraba R, Kabbash I, El-Desouky S BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):687.

PMID: 37742023 PMC: 10518081. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03393-1.


A Bibliometric Study on the Top 101 Most-Cited Articles of Dental Journals of the Middle East/North Africa Countries From 2011 to 2021.

Roghanizadeh L, Baghban A, Azizzadeh J, Asgary S J Lasers Med Sci. 2023; 14:e15.

PMID: 37583497 PMC: 10423963. DOI: 10.34172/jlms.2023.15.


References
1.
Azar M, Safi L, Nikaein A . Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012; 9(2):146-51. PMC: 3353689. DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.95227. View

2.
Silva L, Leonardo M, Nelson-Filho P, Tanomaru J . Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004; 71(1):45-7. View

3.
Barbizam J, Fariniuk L, Marchesan M, Pecora J, Sousa-Neto M . Effectiveness of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques for cleaning flattened root canals. J Endod. 2002; 28(5):365-6. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200205000-00004. View

4.
Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L, Marchionni S, Breschi L, Malagnino V . SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2004; 37(12):832-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00887.x. View

5.
Nagaratna P, Shashikiran N, Subbareddy V . In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006; 24(4):186-91. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.28075. View