» Articles » PMID: 28929542

Visuomotor Effects of Body Part Movements Presented in the First-person Perspective on Imitative Behavior

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Sep 21
PMID 28929542
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Imitative stimuli presented from a first-person perspective (FPP) produce stronger visuomotor effects than those presented from a third-person perspective (TPP) due to the relatively greater response of the mirror neuron system (MNS) to FPP stimuli. Some previous studies utilizing TPP stimuli have reported no differences in MNS activity between moving and static bodies' stimuli. However, few studies have compared visuomotor effects of such stimuli when presented in the FPP. To clarify this issue, we measured cortical activation in 17 participants during a functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imitation task involving three conditions: moving (a lifting finger was presented), static (an "X" appeared on a static finger), and control (an "X" appeared on a button). All stimuli were presented from the FPP or TPP. Participants were asked to lift the finger corresponding to the imitative stimulus. In the FPP condition, moving stimuli elicited greater MNS activation than static stimuli. Furthermore, such movement effects were stronger in the MNS and insula (a region associated with body-ownership) for FPP stimuli than for TPP stimuli. Psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed increased connectivity between the MNS and insula for moving stimuli in the FPP condition. These findings suggest that bodily movements presented in the FPP elicit a greater visuomotor response than static body presented in the FPP, and that the visuomotor effects of bodily movements were greater in the FPP condition than in the TPP condition. Our analyses further indicated that such responses are processed via the neural system underlying body-ownership. Hum Brain Mapp 38:6218-6229, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Citing Articles

The study of movement skills in sports: toward an integrative approach.

Loland S, Ettema G, Sandbakk O Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1252201.

PMID: 37965653 PMC: 10641436. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1252201.


Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia.

Osiurak F, Reynaud E, Baumard J, Rossetti Y, Bartolo A, Lesourd M Brain Commun. 2022; 3(4):fcab263.

PMID: 35350708 PMC: 8936430. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab263.


Future Challenges in the Assessment of Proprioception in Exercise Sciences: Is Imitation an Alternative?.

Munoz-Jimenez J, Rojas-Valverde D, Leon K Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:664667.

PMID: 34149381 PMC: 8206265. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.664667.


Effects of pseudoexperience on the understanding of hemiplegic movements in physical therapists: An fMRI study.

Watanabe R, Katsuyama N, Usui N, Taira M Neuroimage Clin. 2019; 23:101845.

PMID: 31075556 PMC: 6510960. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101845.

References
1.
Uddin L, Kaplan J, Molnar-Szakacs I, Zaidel E, Iacoboni M . Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal "mirror" network in the right hemisphere: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2005; 25(3):926-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.018. View

2.
Jonas M, Siebner H, Biermann-Ruben K, Kessler K, Baumer T, Buchel C . Do simple intransitive finger movements consistently activate frontoparietal mirror neuron areas in humans?. Neuroimage. 2007; 36 Suppl 2:T44-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.028. View

3.
Strumpf H, Mangun G, Boehler C, Stoppel C, Schoenfeld M, Heinze H . The role of the pulvinar in distractor processing and visual search. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012; 34(5):1115-32. PMC: 6870324. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21496. View

4.
Alaerts K, Heremans E, Swinnen S, Wenderoth N . How are observed actions mapped to the observer's motor system? Influence of posture and perspective. Neuropsychologia. 2008; 47(2):415-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.012. View

5.
Vogt S, Taylor P, Hopkins B . Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters. Neuropsychologia. 2003; 41(8):941-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00319-6. View