» Articles » PMID: 28929324

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Neurocritical Care

Overview
Journal Neurocrit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2017 Sep 21
PMID 28929324
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) with acid-suppressive drug therapy is widely utilized in critically ill patients following neurologic injury for the prevention of clinically important stress-related gastrointestinal bleeding (CIB). Data supporting SUP, however, largely originates from studies conducted during an era where practices were vastly different than what is considered routine by today's standard. This is particularly true in neurocritical care patients. In fact, the routine provision of SUP has been challenged due to an increasing prevalence of adverse drug events with acid-suppressive therapy and the perception that CIB rates are sparse. This narrative review will discuss current controversies with SUP as they apply to neurocritical care patients. Specifically, the pathophysiology, prevalence, and risk factors for CIB along with the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of acid-suppressive therapy will be described.

Citing Articles

Stressing over ulcer prophylaxis in the neurocritical trauma patient.

Topper G, Patel P, Egodage T Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024; 9(1):e001418.

PMID: 38450047 PMC: 10916095. DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001418.


A Nomogram for Individualized Prediction of Stress-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Liu S, Wang Y, Gao B, Peng J Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022; 18:221-229.

PMID: 35177906 PMC: 8843804. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S342861.


Audit on Practices of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Gupta D, Bhalotra A, Singh R Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020; 24(3):160-167.

PMID: 32435093 PMC: 7225769. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23368.

References
1.
Barkun A, Adam V, Martel M, Bardou M . Cost-effectiveness analysis: stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists. Value Health. 2013; 16(1):14-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2213. View

2.
Metz C, Livingston D, Smith J, Larson G, Wilson T . Impact of multiple risk factors and ranitidine prophylaxis on the development of stress-related upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. The Ranitidine Head Injury Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1993; 21(12):1844-9. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199312000-00010. View

3.
Ran L, Khatibi N, Qin X, Zhang J . Proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients with an intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011; 111:435-9. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-0693-8_75. View

4.
Buendgens L, Bruensing J, Matthes M, Duckers H, Luedde T, Trautwein C . Administration of proton pump inhibitors in critically ill medical patients is associated with increased risk of developing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Crit Care. 2014; 29(4):696.e11-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.002. View

5.
Chan K, Mann K, Lai E, Ngan J, Tuen H, Yue C . Factors influencing the development of gastrointestinal complications after neurosurgery: results of multivariate analysis. Neurosurgery. 1989; 25(3):378-82. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-198909000-00010. View