» Articles » PMID: 28927994

Current Bone Substitutes for Implant Dentistry

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 Sep 21
PMID 28927994
Citations 75
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Alveolar ridge augmentation is essential for success in implant therapy and depends on the biological performance of bone graft materials. This literature review aims to comprehensively explain the clinically relevant capabilities and limitations of currently available bone substitutes for bone augmentation in light of biomaterial science.

Study Selection: The biological performance of calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes was categorized according to space-making capability, biocompatibility, bioabsorption, and volume maintenance over time. Each category was reviewed based on clinical studies, preclinical animal studies, and in vitro studies.

Results: Currently available bone substitutes provide only osteoconduction as a scaffold but not osteoinduction. Particle size, sensitivity to enzymatic or chemical dissolution, and mechanical properties affect the space-making capability of bone substitutes. The nature of collagen fibers, particulate size, and release of calcium ions influence the biocompatibility of bone substitutes. Bioabsorption of bone substitutes is determined by water solubility (chemical composition) and acid resistance (integrity of apatite structure). Bioabsorption of remnant bone substitute material and volume maintenance of the augmented bone are inversely related.

Conclusion: It is necessary to improve the biocompatibility of currently available bone substitutes and to strike an appropriate balance between bioabsorption and volume maintenance to achieve ideal bone remodeling.

Citing Articles

Performance evolution of the Nano Boron nitride enhanced bone cement composites.

Wang H, Zhang K, Niu W, Min S, Lu F, Zhang S J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):245.

PMID: 40051004 PMC: 11884186. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05626-1.


Histomorphometric and Micro-CT Evaluation of Cerabone and Bio-Oss in Maxillary Sinus Lifting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Pereira R, de Carvalho M, Hochuli-Vieira E, Statkievicz C, Pereira Santos D, Augusto Neto R Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39597019 PMC: 11596879. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111834.


Progress in Dentin-Derived Bone Graft Materials: A New Xenogeneic Dentin-Derived Material with Retained Organic Component Allows for Broader and Easier Application.

Sapoznikov L, Humphrey M Cells. 2024; 13(21.

PMID: 39513913 PMC: 11544873. DOI: 10.3390/cells13211806.


Bone regeneration by a bone substitute biomaterial containing hydroxyapatite, chitosan, xanthan and graphene oxide supplemented with conditioned medium from mesenchymal stem cells.

Rocha D, Lopez D, Ferreira J, Silva M, Filgueiras I, Alves B Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2024; 37(2):151-161.

PMID: 39484748 PMC: 11590008. DOI: 10.54589/aol.37/2/151.


Atypical and Late-Developed Sinus Graft Complications Following Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: Successful Management with Guided Bone Regeneration.

Park W, Okany K, Park W, Han J, Lim H, Kang P Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(8).

PMID: 39202527 PMC: 11355990. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60081246.