» Articles » PMID: 28924694

Developmental Origins of Biological Explanations: The Case of Infants' Internal Property Bias

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2017 Sep 20
PMID 28924694
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

People's explanations about the biological world are heavily biased toward internal, non-obvious properties. Adults and children as young as 5 years of age find internal properties more causally central than external features for explaining general biological processes and category membership. In this paper, we describe how this 'internal property bias' may be grounded in two different developmental precursors observed in studies with infants: (1) an early understanding of biological agency that is apparent in infants' reasoning about animals, and (2) the acquisition of kind-based representations that distinguish between essential and accidental properties, spanning from animals to artifacts. We argue that these precursors may support the progressive construction of the notion of biological kinds and explanations during childhood. Shortly after their first year of life, infants seem to represent the internal properties of animates as more central and identity-determining that external properties. Over time, this skeletal notion of biological kinds is integrated into diverse explanations about kind membership and biological processes, with an increasingly better understanding of the causal role of internal properties.

Citing Articles

"There's something inside": Children's intuitions about animate agents.

Kominsky J, Shafto P, Bonawitz E PLoS One. 2021; 16(5):e0251081.

PMID: 34010276 PMC: 8133430. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251081.


Animacy cues facilitate 10-month-olds' categorization of novel objects with similar insides.

Anderson N, Meagher K, Welder A, Graham S PLoS One. 2018; 13(11):e0207800.

PMID: 30475872 PMC: 6261258. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207800.


Preface for the special issue on The Process of Explanation : Guest Editors: Andrei Cimpian (New York University) and Frank Keil (Yale University).

Cimpian A, Keil F Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 24(5):1361-1363.

PMID: 28940100 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1378-5.

References
1.
Waxman S, Medin D, Ross N . Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Dev Psychol. 2007; 43(2):294-308. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.294. View

2.
Xu F, Carey S . Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity. Cogn Psychol. 1996; 30(2):111-53. DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0005. View

3.
Surian L, Caldi S . Infants' individuation of agents and inert objects. Dev Sci. 2010; 13(1):143-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00873.x. View

4.
Kuhlmeier V, Wynn K, Bloom P . Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(5):402-8. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01454. View

5.
Csibra G, Shamsudheen R . Nonverbal generics: human infants interpret objects as symbols of object kinds. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:689-710. PMC: 4636046. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015232. View