» Articles » PMID: 28921843

Potential Proton and Photon Dose Degradation in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients by Intratherapy Changes

Overview
Date 2017 Sep 19
PMID 28921843
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of dose degradation by anatomic changes for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) relative to intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) and identification of potential indicators for IMPT treatment plan adaptation.

Methods: For 31 advanced HNC datasets, IMPT and IMRT plans were recalculated on a computed tomography scan (CT) taken after about 4 weeks of therapy. Dose parameter changes were determined for the organs at risk (OARs) spinal cord, brain stem, parotid glands, brachial plexus, and mandible, for the clinical target volume (CTV) and the healthy tissue outside planning target volume (PTV). Correlation of dose degradation with target volume changes and quality of rigid CT matching was investigated.

Results: Recalculated IMPT dose distributions showed stronger degradation than the IMRT doses. OAR analysis revealed significant changes in parotid median dose (IMPT) and near maximum dose (D ) of spinal cord (IMPT, IMRT) and mandible (IMPT). OAR dose parameters remained lower in IMPT cases. CTV coverage (V ) and overdose (V ) deteriorated for IMPT plans to (93.4 ± 5.4)% and (10.6 ± 12.5)%, while those for IMRT plans remained acceptable. Recalculated plans showed similarly decreased PTV conformity, but considerable hotspots, also outside the PTV, emerged in IMPT cases. Lower CT matching quality was significantly correlated with loss of PTV conformity (IMPT, IMRT), CTV homogeneity and coverage (IMPT). Target shrinkage correlated with increased dose in brachial plexus (IMRT, IMPT), hotspot generation outside the PTV (IMPT) and lower PTV conformity (IMRT).

Conclusions: The study underlines the necessity of precise positioning and monitoring of anatomy changes, especially in IMPT which might require adaptation more often. Since OAR doses remained typically below constraints, IMPT plan adaptation will be indicated by target dose degradations.

Citing Articles

Proton Therapy Adaptation of Perisinusoidal and Brain Areas in the Cyclotron Centre Bronowice in Krakow: A Dosimetric Analysis.

Rydygier M, Skora T, Kisielewicz K, Spaleniak A, Garbacz M, Lipa M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39335100 PMC: 11430589. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183128.


CBCT-Based Dose Monitoring and Adaptive Planning Triggers in Head and Neck PBS Proton Therapy.

Reiners K, Dagan R, Holtzman A, Bryant C, Andersson S, Nilsson R Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568697 PMC: 10417147. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153881.


Evaluating the effect of setup uncertainty reduction and adaptation to geometric changes on normal tissue complication probability using online adaptive head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.

Lalonde A, Bobic M, Sharp G, Chamseddine I, Winey B, Paganetti H Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(11).

PMID: 37164020 PMC: 10351361. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acd433.


Dosimetric impact of adaptive proton therapy in head and neck cancer - A review.

Huiskes M, Astreinidou E, Kong W, Breedveld S, Heijmen B, Rasch C Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2023; 39:100598.

PMID: 36860581 PMC: 9969246. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100598.


Advances in Image-Guided Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Oral Cavity Cancer.

Nien H, Wang L, Liao L, Lin P, Wu C, Shueng P Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(19).

PMID: 36230553 PMC: 9561985. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194630.


References
1.
Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Lomax A, Bolsi A . A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours. Radiother Oncol. 2001; 61(3):287-97. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00403-0. View

2.
Barker Jr J, Garden A, Ang K, ODaniel J, Wang H, Court L . Quantification of volumetric and geometric changes occurring during fractionated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 59(4):960-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.024. View

3.
Lee N, Puri D, Blanco A, Chao K . Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: an update. Head Neck. 2005; 29(4):387-400. DOI: 10.1002/hed.20332. View

4.
Popple R, Fiveash J, Brezovich I . Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2007; 34(10):3752-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.2779862. View

5.
Hall W, Guiou M, Lee N, Dublin A, Narayan S, Vijayakumar S . Development and validation of a standardized method for contouring the brachial plexus: preliminary dosimetric analysis among patients treated with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72(5):1362-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.004. View