» Articles » PMID: 28920099

Fast Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve Based Upon Steady-State Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis: Results From the VIRTU-Fast Study

Overview
Date 2017 Sep 19
PMID 28920099
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous intervention is superior to standard assessment but remains underused. The authors have developed a novel "pseudotransient" analysis protocol for computing virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) based upon angiographic images and steady-state computational fluid dynamics. This protocol generates vFFR results in 189 s (cf >24 h for transient analysis) using a desktop PC, with <1% error relative to that of full-transient computational fluid dynamics analysis. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that physiological lesion significance was influenced less by coronary or lesion anatomy (33%) and more by microvascular physiology (59%). If coronary microvascular resistance can be estimated, vFFR can be accurately computed in less time than it takes to make invasive measurements.

Citing Articles

Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis for Non-invasive Model-Based Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Prediction.

Dalmaso C, Fossan F, Braten A, Muller L Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2025; 41(1):e3898.

PMID: 39777995 PMC: 11706247. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3898.


Overview of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Flow Ratio in the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions.

Westra J, Tu S US Cardiol. 2024; 14:e09.

PMID: 39720454 PMC: 11664755. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2020.09.


Current and Future Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Coronary Artery Disease.

Candreva A, De Nisco G, Lodi Rizzini M, DAscenzo F, De Ferrari G, Gallo D Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 23(11):377.

PMID: 39076179 PMC: 11269074. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2311377.


Patient-specific 3D coronary model in cardiac catheterisation laboratories.

Lashgari M, Choudhury R, Banerjee A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1398290.

PMID: 39036504 PMC: 11257904. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1398290.


Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Angiography Derived Computational Fractional Flow Reserve.

Vardhan M, Tanade C, Chen S, Mahmood O, Chakravartti J, Jones W J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(13):e029941.

PMID: 38904250 PMC: 11255717. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029941.


References
1.
Kappetein A, Dawkins K, Mohr F, Morice M, Mack M, Russell M . Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006; 29(4):486-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.047. View

2.
Gorlin R, GORLIN S . Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J. 1951; 41(1):1-29. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(51)90002-6. View

3.
Morris P, van de Vosse F, Lawford P, Hose D, Gunn J . "Virtual" (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve: Current Challenges and Limitations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(8):1009-1017. PMC: 4726733. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.006. View

4.
Pijls N, Fearon W, Tonino P, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B . Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.012. View

5.
Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M . Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(19):2024-2035. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013. View