» Articles » PMID: 28916871

Strength and Functional Symmetry is Associated with Post-operative Rehabilitation in Patients Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Sep 17
PMID 28916871
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate strength and functional symmetry during common tests in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and its association with post-operative rehabilitation.

Methods: At a median 11.0 months post-surgery (range 10-14), 111 ACLR patients were assessed. A rehabilitation grading tool was employed to evaluate the duration and supervision of rehabilitation, as well as whether structured jumping, landing and agility exercises were undertaken. Patients completed the Noyes Activity Score (NSARS), maximal isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength assessment, and a 4-hop test battery. Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) were calculated, presented for the entire group and also stratified by activity level. ANOVA evaluated differences between the operated and unaffected limbs across all tests. Correlations were undertaken to assess the relationship between post-operative rehabilitation and objective test LSIs.

Results: The unaffected limb was significantly better (p < 0.0001) than the operated limb for all tests. Only 52-61 patients (47-55%) demonstrated LSIs ≥ 90% for each of the hop tests. Only 34 (30.6%) and 61 (55.0%) patients were ≥ 90% LSI for peak quadriceps and hamstring strength, respectively. Specifically in patients actively participating in jumping, pivoting, cutting, twisting and/or turning sports, 21 patients (36.8%) still demonstrated an LSI < 90% for the single hop for distance, with 37 patients (65.0%) at < 90% for peak knee extension strength. Rehabilitation was significantly associated with the LSIs for all tests.

Conclusion: Rehabilitation was significantly correlated with limb symmetry, and lower limb symmetry was below recommended criterion for many community-level ACLR patients, including those already engaging in riskier activities. It is clear that many patients are not undertaking the rehabilitation required to address post-operative strength and functional deficits, and are being cleared to return to sport (or are returning on their own accord) without appropriate evaluation and further guidance.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

Citing Articles

Gait Asymmetry and Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Preliminary Study.

Pringle S, DAout K Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001975 PMC: 11851828. DOI: 10.3390/biology14020208.


Higher Unilateral Muscle Imbalance at the Contralateral Knee 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

de Dicastillo L, Villalabeitia J, Delgado D, Jorquera C, Andrade R, Espregueira-Mendes J Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39330721 PMC: 11435792. DOI: 10.3390/sports12090243.


Three-month functional training programme improves knee joint function in athletes post-ACL reconstruction surgery.

Du C, Jiao J, Zhou J, Chow B, Shi Q, Zhang X J Rehabil Med. 2024; 56:jrm18701.

PMID: 39291912 PMC: 11418274. DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.18701.


Assessing the Relationship of Psychological Sport Readiness, Single-leg Vertical Jump, and Non-Sagittal Single-Leg Hops to Quadriceps Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Kuwik P, Florkiewicz E, Benedict T, Mason J, Morris J, Crowell M Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(8):942-955.

PMID: 39100937 PMC: 11297365. DOI: 10.26603/001c.121597.


Comparative Effectiveness of Supervised and Home-Based Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Athletes.

Syed R, Hangody L, Frischmann G, Kos P, Kopper B, Berkes I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673520 PMC: 11051221. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082245.


References
1.
Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K . Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005; 21(8):948-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.04.110. View

2.
Hamrin Senorski E, Samuelsson K, Thomee C, Beischer S, Karlsson J, Thomee R . Return to knee-strenuous sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a report from a rehabilitation outcome registry of patient characteristics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 25(5):1364-1374. PMC: 5432591. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4280-1. View

3.
Holm I, Oiestad B, Risberg M, Aune A . No difference in knee function or prevalence of osteoarthritis after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with 4-strand hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon-bone autograft: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(3):448-54. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509350301. View

4.
Souissi S, Wong D, Dellal A, Croisier J, Ellouze Z, Chamari K . Improving Functional Performance and Muscle Power 4-to-6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 10(4):655-64. PMC: 3761516. View

5.
Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Matthews H . Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, hamstring versus bone-patella tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from surgery. Knee. 2005; 12(1):41-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2004.02.003. View