» Articles » PMID: 28915866

Should Manual Detorsion Be a Routine Part of Treatment in Testicular Torsion?

Overview
Journal BMC Urol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Urology
Date 2017 Sep 17
PMID 28915866
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It was aimed to investigate the efficiency and reliability of the manual detorsion (MD) procedure in patients diagnosed with testicular torsion (TT).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of the data of 57 patients diagnosed with TT, comprising 20 patients with successful MD (Group I), 28 patients who underwent emergency orchiopexy (Group II), and 9 patients applied with orchiectomy (Group III). The groups were compared in respect of age, and duration of pain. The success rate of MD, the time of testicular fixation (TF), any problems encountered in follow-up, and follow-up times were analyzed in Group I. Data were analyzed with P-P pilot, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis and Chi-square tests. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: MD was successful and detorsion could be achieved in 20 of 26 patients. The groups were similar in respect of age (p = 0.217). The median duration of pain was 3 (1-8), 4 (1-72), and 48 (12-144) hours in Groups I, II, and III, respectively, and determined as similar in Groups I and II (p = 0.257), although a statistically significant difference was determined between the 3 groups (p < 0.001). TF was applied to Group I after median 10 (0-45) days, and no parenchymal disorder was determined in the median follow-up period of 21.5 (2-40) months.

Conclusion: MD that can be easily and immediately performed after the diagnosis of TT decreases ischemia time. This seems to be an efficient and reliable procedure when applied together with elective orchiopexy, as a part of the treatment.

Citing Articles

Clinical characteristics and management strategies of testicular torsion in children with cryptorchidism: a comprehensive analysis.

Tao C, Yu Z, Cao Y Transl Androl Urol. 2025; 14(1):103-111.

PMID: 39974800 PMC: 11833526. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-468.


Seasonal Variations in Testicular Torsion: A Retrospective Study.

Raffee L, Bani Ali M, Alawneh K, Negresh N, Alawneh H, Al-Shatnawi A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76508.

PMID: 39877779 PMC: 11773996. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76508.


The management of testicular torsion: A survey of Turkish pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists.

Canbaz F, Gercel G, Sag S Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024; 30(9):685-693.

PMID: 39222498 PMC: 11622717. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.52932.


Testicular Traction Technique with Intact Cremasteric Reflex, a Novel Approach for Manual Detorsion: Case Report.

Trang G, Brinkerhoff T Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2024; 8(3):226-230.

PMID: 39158237 PMC: 11326050. DOI: 10.5811/cpcem.1568.


Testicular torsion and ultrasound-assisted manual detorsion.

Vazquez J, Fernandez M, Comendador-Morales A, Prada-Arias M Pediatr Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39112569 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-06008-1.


References
1.
Visser A, Heyns C . Testicular function after torsion of the spermatic cord. BJU Int. 2003; 92(3):200-3. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04307.x. View

2.
Vordermark 2nd J . Testicular torsion: management with ultrasonic Doppler flow detector. Urology. 1984; 24(1):41-2. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90385-6. View

3.
Kiesling Jr V, Schroeder D, Pauljev P, Hull J . Spermatic cord block and manual reduction: primary treatment for spermatic cord torsion. J Urol. 1984; 132(5):921-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49947-2. View

4.
Sessions A, Rabinowitz R, Hulbert W, Goldstein M, Mevorach R . Testicular torsion: direction, degree, duration and disinformation. J Urol. 2003; 169(2):663-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000047381.36380.0e. View

5.
Makela E, Lahdes-Vasama T, Rajakorpi H, Wikstrom S . A 19-year review of paediatric patients with acute scrotum. Scand J Surg. 2007; 96(1):62-6. DOI: 10.1177/145749690709600112. View