» Articles » PMID: 28913286

Treatment of Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis Using Multi-Split Osteotomy and Rigid Fixation with Absorbable Plates

Overview
Date 2017 Sep 16
PMID 28913286
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is a relatively common craniofacial anomaly and various techniques were introduced to achieve its operative goals. Authors found that by using smaller bone fragments than that used in conventional cranioplasty, sufficiently rigid bone union and effective regeneration capacity could be achieved with better postoperative outcome, only if their stable fixation was ensured.

Methods: Through bicoronal incisional approach, involved synostotic cranial bone together with its surrounding areas were removed. The resected bone flap was split into as many pieces as possible. The extent of this 'multi-split osteotomy' depends on the degree of dysmorphology, expectative volume increment after surgery and probable dead space caused by bony gap between bone segments. Rigid interosseous fixation was performed with variable types of absorbable plate and screw. In all cases, the pre-operational three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) was checked and brain CT was taken immediately after the surgery. Also about 12 months after the operation, 3D CT was checked again to see postoperative morphology improvement, bone union, regeneration and intracranial volume change.

Results: The bony gaps seen in the immediate postoperative brain CT were all improved as seen in the 3D CT after 12 months from the surgery. No small bone fragment resorption was observed. Brain volume increase was found to be made gradually, leaving no case of remaining epidural dead space.

Conclusion: We conclude that it is meaningful in presenting a new possibility to be applied to not only nonsyndromic craniosynostosis but also other reconstructive cranial vault surgeries.

References
1.
Moon S, Paik H, Byeon J . Treatment of sagittal synostosis: subtotal cranial vault remodelling with right-angled Z-osteotomies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63(11):1787-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.006. View

2.
Sgouros S, Hockley A, Goldin J, Wake M, Natarajan K . Intracranial volume change in craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg. 1999; 91(4):617-25. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.4.0617. View

3.
Clayman M, Murad G, Steele M, Seagle M, Pincus D . History of craniosynostosis surgery and the evolution of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques: the University of Florida experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 58(3):285-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000250846.12958.05. View

4.
Marchac D, Renier D . Treatment of craniosynostosis in infancy. Clin Plast Surg. 1987; 14(1):61-72. View

5.
Seruya M, Shen S, Wang L, Penington A, Wray A, Greensmith A . Three patterns of fronto-orbital remodeling for metopic synostosis: comparison of cranial growth outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134(5):787e-795e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000588. View