» Articles » PMID: 28911092

Concurrent and Sequential Initiation of Ovarian Function Suppression with Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Women with Endocrine-responsive Early Breast Cancer: an Exploratory Analysis of TEXT and SOFT

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Sep 16
PMID 28911092
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent breast cancer treatment guidelines recommend that higher-risk premenopausal patients should receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of adjuvant endocrine therapy. If chemotherapy is also given, it is uncertain whether to select concurrent or sequential OFS initiation.

Design And Methods: We analyzed 1872 patients enrolled in the randomized phase III TEXT and SOFT trials who received adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and upon randomization to an OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy, initiated gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-agonist triptorelin. Breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) was compared between patients who received OFS concurrently with chemotherapy in TEXT (n = 1242) versus sequentially post-chemotherapy in SOFT (n = 630). Because timing of trial enrollment relative to adjuvant chemotherapy differed, we implemented landmark analysis re-defining BCFI beginning 1 year after final dose of chemotherapy (median, 15.5 and 8.1 months from enrollment to landmark in TEXT and SOFT, respectively). As a non-randomized treatment comparison, we implemented comparative-effectiveness propensity score methodology with weighted Cox modeling.

Results: Distributions of several clinico-pathologic characteristics differed between groups. Patients who were premenopausal post-chemotherapy in SOFT were younger on average. The median duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 18 weeks in both groups. There were 231 (12%) BC events after post-landmark median follow-up of about 5 years. Concurrent use of triptorelin with chemotherapy was not associated with a significant difference in post-landmark BCFI compared with sequential triptorelin post-chemotherapy, either in the overall population (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.72-1.72; P = 0.72; 4-year BCFI 89% in both groups), or in the subgroup of 692 women <40 years at diagnosis (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.69-1.84) who are less likely to develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea.

Conclusion: Based on comparative-effectiveness modeling of TEXT and SOFT after about 5 years median follow-up, with limited statistical power especially for the subgroup <40 years, neither detrimental nor beneficial effect of concurrent administration of OFS with chemotherapy on the efficacy of adjuvant therapy that includes chemotherapy was detected.

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00066690 and NCT00066703.

Citing Articles

Optimizing Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer Management in India: Insights From Expert Consensus.

Vaid A, Pagani O, Ramesh A, Bharthuar A, Desai C, Biswas G Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76392.

PMID: 39867062 PMC: 11763344. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76392.


Nanoparticle innovations in targeted cancer therapy: advancements in antibody-drug conjugates.

Abdelhamid M, Wadan A, Saad H, El-Dakroury W, Hageen A, Mohammed D Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025; .

PMID: 39825965 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03764-7.


Sequential versus concurrent adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for HR+ early breast cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Li T, Shan Z, Shi Y, Kuang X, Yu L, Tang S Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 3:8.

PMID: 38751511 PMC: 11093067. DOI: 10.21037/tbcr-21-3.


Chemotherapy impairs ovarian function through excessive ROS-induced ferroptosis.

Zhang S, Liu Q, Chang M, Pan Y, Yahaya B, Liu Y Cell Death Dis. 2023; 14(5):340.

PMID: 37225709 PMC: 10209065. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-023-05859-0.


Breast cancer: an up-to-date review and future perspectives.

Hong R, Xu B Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022; 42(10):913-936.

PMID: 36074908 PMC: 9558690. DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12358.


References
1.
Burstein H, Lacchetti C, Anderson H, Buchholz T, Davidson N, Gelmon K . Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Ovarian Suppression. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(14):1689-701. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9573. View

2.
Coates A, Winer E, Goldhirsch A, Gelber R, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M . Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(8):1533-46. PMC: 4511219. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221. View

3.
Austin P . The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med. 2013; 33(7):1242-58. PMC: 4285179. DOI: 10.1002/sim.5984. View

4.
Pagani O, Regan M, Walley B, Fleming G, Colleoni M, Lang I . Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(2):107-18. PMC: 4175521. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404037. View

5.
Aebi S, Gelber S, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber R, Collins J, Thurlimann B . Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer?. Lancet. 2000; 355(9218):1869-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02292-3. View