» Articles » PMID: 28905305

A Systematic Review of Promising Strategies of Faith-Based Cancer Education and Lifestyle Interventions Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups

Overview
Journal J Cancer Educ
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Sep 15
PMID 28905305
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Church-based interventions have been used to reach racial/ethnic minorities. In order to develop effective programs, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review of faith-based cancer prevention studies (2005~2016) to examine characteristics and promising strategies. Combination terms "church or faith-based or religion," "intervention or program," and "cancer education or lifestyle" were used in searching the five major databases: CINAHL; ERIC; Health Technology Assessments; MEDLINE; and PsycInfo. A total of 20 studies met study criteria. CDC's Community Guide was used to analyze and review group interventions. Analyses were organized by two racial groups: African American (AA) and Latino/Hispanic American groups. Results showed most studies reviewed focused on breast cancer alone or in combination with other cancers. Studies of Latino/Hispanic groups targeted more on uninsured, Medicare, or Medicaid individuals, whereas AA studies generally did not include specific insurance criteria. The sample sizes of the AA studies were generally larger. The majority of these studies reviewed used pre-post, posttest only with control group, or quasi-experience designs. The Health Belief Model was the most commonly used theory in both groups. Community-based participatory research and empowerment/ecological frameworks were also used frequently in the Latino/Hispanic studies. Small media and group education were the top two most popular intervention strategies in both groups. Although one-on-one strategy was used in some Latino studies, neither group used reducing client out-of-pocket costs strategy. Client reminders could also be used more in both groups as well. Current review showed church-based cancer education programs were effective in changing knowledge, but not always screening utilization. Results show faith-based cancer educational interventions are promising. To maximize intervention impact, future studies might consider using stronger study designs, incorporating a variety of proven effective strategies, including those frequently used evidence-based strategies, as well as exploring promising strategies among specific target groups.

Citing Articles

Cancer interventions with faith-based organizations: a scoping review.

Yeary K, Allen J, Arredondo E, Atemnkeng J, Buzcu-Guven B, Day K Cancer Causes Control. 2025; .

PMID: 40038170 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-025-01977-6.


Exploring the Role of Communication Asset Mapping (CAM) as a Strategy to Promote Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment Information Within African American Communities.

Lumpkins C, Kaphingst K, Miller L, Cooper E, Smith M, Belshe K Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39857528 PMC: 11771212. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010075.


Breast Cancer Screening among African Immigrants in the United States: An Integrative Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Interventions.

Rauch J, Daniels J, Robillard A, Joseph R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(8).

PMID: 39200613 PMC: 11353535. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21081004.


Mosques and Public Health Promotion: A Scoping Review of Faith-Driven Health Interventions.

Abu-Ras W, Aboul-Enein B, Almoayad F, Benajiba N, Dodge E Health Educ Behav. 2024; 51(5):677-690.

PMID: 39099318 PMC: 11416736. DOI: 10.1177/10901981241252800.


Equipping Faith-Based Communities for Cancer Support Ministry: A Pilot Study of Cancer Support Training for Members of African-American Churches in the USA.

Kwarteng J, White K, Nevels D, Brown S, Stolley M J Relig Health. 2024; 63(2):1523-1537.

PMID: 38453721 PMC: 11672192. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-024-02013-8.


References
1.
Griffith K, Passmore S, Smith D, Wenzel J . African Americans with a family history of colorectal cancer: barriers and facilitators to screening. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012; 39(3):299-306. DOI: 10.1188/12.ONF.299-306. View

2.
Luque J, Tyson D, Markossian T, Lee J, Turner R, Proctor S . Increasing cervical cancer screening in a Hispanic migrant farmworker community through faith-based clinical outreach. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011; 15(3):200-4. PMC: 3735442. DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318206004a. View

3.
. Cancer screening - United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61(3):41-5. View

4.
Liang W, Wang J, Chen M, Feng S, Yi B, Mandelblatt J . Cultural views, language ability, and mammography use in Chinese American women. Health Educ Behav. 2009; 36(6):1012-25. PMC: 3577419. DOI: 10.1177/1090198109331669. View

5.
Welsh A, Sauaia A, Jacobellis J, Min S, Byers T . The effect of two church-based interventions on breast cancer screening rates among Medicaid-insured Latinas. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005; 2(4):A07. PMC: 1435704. View