» Articles » PMID: 28893244

A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of the Cardiovascular Safety of the Once-weekly DPP-4 Inhibitor Omarigliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Sep 13
PMID 28893244
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Omarigliptin is a once-weekly (q.w.) oral DPP-4 inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Japan. To support approval of omarigliptin in the United States, the clinical development program included a cardiovascular (CV) safety study. Subsequently, a business decision was made not to submit a marketing application for omarigliptin in the United States, and the CV safety study was terminated. Herein we report an analysis of data from that early-terminated study.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind study, 4202 patients with T2DM and established CV disease were assigned to either omarigliptin 25 mg q.w. or matching placebo in addition to their existing diabetes therapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to summarize the primary endpoint of time to first major adverse CV event (MACE, the composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) and the analysis of first event of hospitalization for heart failure (hHF).

Results: The median follow-up was approximately 96 weeks (range 1.1-178.6 weeks). The primary MACE outcome occurred in 114/2092 patients in the omarigliptin group (5.45%; 2.96/100 patient-years) and 114/2100 patients in the placebo group (5.43%; 2.97/100 patient-years), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77, 1.29). The hHF outcome occurred in 20/2092 patients in the omarigliptin group (0.96%; 0.51/100 patient-years) and 33/2100 patients in the placebo group (1.57%; 0.85/100 patient-years), with an HR of 0.60 (95% CI 0.35, 1.05). After 142 weeks, the least-squares mean difference (omarigliptin vs. placebo) in glycated hemoglobin levels was -0.3% (95% CI -0.46, -0.14). The numbers of patients with adverse events, serious adverse events or discontinued from study medication due to adverse events were similar in the omarigliptin and placebo groups.

Conclusions: In this CV safety study of patients with T2DM and established CV disease, omarigliptin did not increase the risk of MACE or hHF and was generally well tolerated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01703208. Registered 05 October 2012.

Citing Articles

Comparative cardiovascular effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lin Y, Wu J, Lee M, Su C, Toh H, Chang W Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025; 11(2):174-189.

PMID: 39923808 PMC: 11905764. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae093.


Age and Sex Differences in Efficacy of Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Hanlon P, Butterly E, Wei L, Wightman H, Almazam S, Alsallumi K JAMA. 2025; .

PMID: 39899304 PMC: 11791772. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.27402.


Cardiovascular Therapy Benefits of Novel Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complicated With Cardiovascular Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Shi S, Li X, Chen Y, Li J, Dai Y J Diabetes. 2025; 17(1):e70044.

PMID: 39789833 PMC: 11717902. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.70044.


Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on the risk of acute respiratory failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Wang Y, Yu C, Zheng X, Wang Y, Zhang W Endocr J. 2024; 71(12):1175-1181.

PMID: 39261020 PMC: 11778361. DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ24-0164.


Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor sitagliptin decreases myocardial fibrosis and modulates myocardial insulin signaling in a swine model of chronic myocardial ischemia.

Harris D, Sabe S, Broadwin M, Stone C, Bellam K, Malhotra A PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307922.

PMID: 39074126 PMC: 11285952. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307922.


References
1.
White W, Cannon C, Heller S, Nissen S, Bergenstal R, Bakris G . Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(14):1327-35. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305889. View

2.
Moses R, Round E, Shentu Y, Golm G, ONeill E, Gantz I . A randomized clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin added to the combination of sulfonylurea and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemic control. J Diabetes. 2015; 8(5):701-11. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12351. View

3.
Zannad F, Cannon C, Cushman W, Bakris G, Menon V, Perez A . Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2015; 385(9982):2067-76. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62225-X. View

4.
Egan A, Blind E, Dunder K, de Graeff P, Hummer B, Bourcier T . Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs--FDA and EMA assessment. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(9):794-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1314078. View

5.
Hermansen K, Kipnes M, Luo E, Fanurik D, Khatami H, Stein P . Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007; 9(5):733-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00744.x. View