» Articles » PMID: 28892266

Cervical Dilatation Patterns of 'low-risk' Women with Spontaneous Labour and Normal Perinatal Outcomes: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BJOG
Date 2017 Sep 12
PMID 28892266
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The call for women-centred approaches to reduce labour interventions, particularly primary caesarean section, has renewed an interest in gaining a better understanding of natural labour progression.

Objective: To synthesise available data on the cervical dilatation patterns during spontaneous labour of 'low-risk' women with normal perinatal outcomes.

Search Strategy: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, POPLINE, Global Health Library, and reference lists of eligible studies.

Selection Criteria: Observational studies and other study designs.

Data Collection And Analysis: Two authors extracted data on: maternal characteristics; labour interventions; the duration of labour centimetre by centimetre; and the duration of labour from dilatation at admission through to 10 cm. We pooled data across studies using weighted medians and employed the Bootstrap-t method to generate the corresponding confidence bounds.

Main Results: Seven observational studies describing labour patterns for 99 971 women met our inclusion criteria. The median time to advance by 1 cm in nulliparous women was longer than 1 hour until a dilatation of 5 cm was reached, with markedly rapid progress after 6 cm. Similar labour progression patterns were observed in parous women. The 95th percentiles for both parity groups suggest that it was not uncommon for some women to reach 10 cm, despite dilatation rates that were much slower than the 1-cm/hour threshold for most part of their first stage of labours.

Conclusion: An expectation of a minimum cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout the first stage of labour is unrealistic for most healthy nulliparous and parous women. Our findings call into question the universal application of clinical standards that are conceptually based on an expectation of linear labour progress in all women.

Funding: UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

Tweetable Abstract: Cervical dilatation threshold of 1 cm/hour throughout labour is unrealistic for most women, regardless of parity.

Citing Articles

Can the use of a next generation partograph based on WHO's latest intrapartum care recommendations improve neonatal outcomes? (PICRINO) Study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

Isgren A, Korsoski R, Abrahamsson T, Brismar Wendel S, Kallen K, Lundborg L PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0316336.

PMID: 40036215 PMC: 11878932. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316336.


Timing of cesarean section for prolonged labor in urban Tanzania: A criterion-based audit.

Kujabi M, Housseine N, Kabanda I, Msumi R, Maembe L, Sangalala M AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(4):100404.

PMID: 39583576 PMC: 11582455. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100404.


Adverse Perinatal Outcomes Among Teenage Mothers Delivering at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwestern Uganda: Prevalence and Associated Factors.

Ngonzi J, Byamukama O, Birungi W, Kamugisha A, Ntaro M, Nambozi G Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69040.

PMID: 39258103 PMC: 11386187. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69040.


Inconsistent definitions of prolonged labor in international literature: a scoping review.

Bakker W, Sandberg E, Keetels S, Schoones J, Kujabi M, Maaloe N AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(3):100360.

PMID: 39040660 PMC: 11261896. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100360.


Labor patterns of spontaneous first-stage labor in Chinese women with normal neonatal outcomes.

Peng L, Chen Z, Weng S, Huang J, Peng M, Deng Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0305243.

PMID: 38959186 PMC: 11221650. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305243.


References
1.
Betran A, Ye J, Moller A, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu A, Torloni M . The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0148343. PMC: 4743929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. View

2.
Friedman E . Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1956; 8(6):691-703. View

3.
Zhang J, Troendle J, Yancey M . Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187(4):824-8. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.127142. View

4.
Oladapo O, Diaz V, Bonet M, Abalos E, Thwin S, Souza H . Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2017; 125(8):944-954. PMC: 6033146. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14930. View

5.
Friedman E, SACHTLEBEN M . Dysfunctional labor. I. Prolonged latent phase in the nullipara. Obstet Gynecol. 1961; 17:135-48. View