» Articles » PMID: 28892151

The Genetic Breakdown of Sporophytic Self-incompatibility in Tolpis Coronopifolia (Asteraceae)

Overview
Journal New Phytol
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Sep 12
PMID 28892151
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Angiosperm diversity has been shaped by mating system evolution, with the most common transition from outcrossing to self-fertilizing. To investigate the genetic basis of this transition, we performed crosses between two species endemic to the Canary Islands, the self-compatible (SC) species Tolpis coronopifolia and its self-incompatible (SI) relative Tolpis santosii. We scored self-compatibility as self-seed set of recombinant plants within two F populations. To map and genetically characterize the breakdown of SI, we built a draft genome sequence of T. coronopifolia, genotyped F plants using multiplexed shotgun genotyping (MSG), and located MSG markers to the genome sequence. We identified a single quantitative trait locus (QTL) that explains nearly all variation in self-seed set in both F populations. To identify putative causal genetic variants within the QTL, we performed transcriptome sequencing on mature floral tissue from both SI and SC species, constructed a transcriptome for each species, and then located each predicted transcript to the T. coronopifolia genome sequence. We annotated each predicted gene within the QTL and found two strong candidates for SI breakdown. Each gene has a coding sequence insertion/deletion mutation within the SC species that produces a truncated protein. Homologs of each gene have been implicated in pollen development, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth in other species.

Citing Articles

Self-incompatibility: a targeted, unexplored pre-fertilization barrier in flower crops of Asteraceae.

Bala M, Rehana S, Singh M J Plant Res. 2023; 136(5):587-612.

PMID: 37452973 DOI: 10.1007/s10265-023-01480-6.


Exploration of molecular mechanism of intraspecific cross-incompatibility in sweetpotato by transcriptome and metabolome analysis.

Yang Y, Zhang X, Zou H, Chen J, Wang Z, Luo Z Plant Mol Biol. 2022; 109(1-2):115-133.

PMID: 35338442 PMC: 9072463. DOI: 10.1007/s11103-022-01259-8.


How rapidly do self-compatible populations evolve selfing? Mating system estimation within recently evolved self-compatible populations of Azorean (Asteraceae).

Kerbs B, Crawford D, White G, Moura M, Borges Silva L, Schaefer H Ecol Evol. 2021; 10(24):13990-13999.

PMID: 33391697 PMC: 7771160. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6992.


, an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene in , Confers Self-Incompatibility in Transgenic .

Chen M, Fan W, Hao B, Zhang W, Yan M, Zhao Y Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(4).

PMID: 32093420 PMC: 7073078. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041458.


Quantitative Genetic Mapping and Genome Assembly in the Lesser Wax Moth .

Koseva B, Hackett J, Zhou Y, Harris B, Kelly J, Greenfield M G3 (Bethesda). 2019; 9(7):2349-2361.

PMID: 31101652 PMC: 6643890. DOI: 10.1534/g3.119.400090.

References
1.
Goodwillie C, Ritland C, Ritland K . The genetic basis of floral traits associated with mating system evolution in Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae): an analysis of quantitative trait loci. Evolution. 2006; 60(3):491-504. View

2.
El-Kasmi F, Pacher T, Strompen G, Stierhof Y, Muller L, Koncz C . Arabidopsis SNARE protein SEC22 is essential for gametophyte development and maintenance of Golgi-stack integrity. Plant J. 2011; 66(2):268-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04487.x. View

3.
Kelley D, Schatz M, Salzberg S . Quake: quality-aware detection and correction of sequencing errors. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(11):R116. PMC: 3156955. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-11-r116. View

4.
Wang Y, Zhang W, Song L, Zou J, Su Z, Wu W . Transcriptome analyses show changes in gene expression to accompany pollen germination and tube growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008; 148(3):1201-11. PMC: 2577266. DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.126375. View

5.
Hiscock S, McInnis S . Pollen recognition and rejection during the sporophytic self-incompatibility response: Brassica and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. 2003; 8(12):606-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.10.007. View