» Articles » PMID: 28886702

Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in a Resource-limited Setting: a Dose Escalation Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Sep 10
PMID 28886702
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Oral misoprostol as an induction of labour (IOL) agent is rapidly gaining popularity in resource-limited settings because it is cheap, stable at ambient temperatures, and logistically easier to administer compared to dinoprostone and oxytocin. We aim to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a regimen of oral misoprostol in Papua New Guinean women undergoing IOL.

Methods: As part of a prospective dose escalation study conducted at Modilon Hospital in Papua New Guinea, women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation and an unfavourable cervix who gave written informed consent were administered oral misoprostol, commencing at 25mcg once every 2 h for 4 doses and increased to 50mcg once every 2 h for 8 doses within 24 h. The primary outcomes studied were i) the proportion of women delivering within 24 h of oral misoprostol administration, and ii) rates of maternal and perinatal severe adverse events.

Results: Of 6167 labour ward screened admissions, 209 women (3%) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria and underwent IOL. Overall, 74% (155/209 [95% confidence interval 67.6-79.9]) delivered within 24 h. Most women (90%; 188/209; 95% CI [84.9-93.5]) delivered vaginally with 86% (180/209) having a good outcome for both the mother and baby. Of the 10% (21/209) who failed IOL and underwent caesarean section, a significant proportion of their babies were admitted to special-care nursery compared to babies delivered vaginally (20/21 [95%] versus 8/188 [4%]; Fisher Exact test P < 0.001), but their perinatal mortality rate was not significantly higher (1/21 [5%] versus 2/188 [1%]; P = 0.30). The only maternal death was not study related and occurred in a patient with post-partum haemorrhage, 15 h post-delivery.

Conclusion: The oral misoprostol regimen for IOL described in the present study is safe, effective and logistically feasible to administer in a resource-limited setting.

Citing Articles

A comparative analysis of methods of preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor in Poland and in Germany (Part II): maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Kleszcz A, Cwiek D, Sipak-Szmigiel O BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):72.

PMID: 39871179 PMC: 11770951. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07015-8.


Comparing labour induction outcomes using misoprostol and dinoprostone in term pregnancies: A retrospective study at Kiambu Level 5 Hospital between 2018 and 2020.

Mwancha-Kwasa M, Admani R, Mbuga M, Maina M, Mwangi J, Nganga L PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0304631.

PMID: 38820427 PMC: 11142478. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304631.


Induction of Labour among Pregnant Women in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Centre.

Yadav S, Yadav I, Pradhan T, Jyoti S, Yadav R JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2024; 61(265):687-690.

PMID: 38289805 PMC: 10579742. DOI: 10.31729/jnma.8255.


What do healthcare providers think of the quality of uterotonics? A mixed-methods systematic review.

Torloni M, Betran A, Vazquez Corona M, Bohren M, Widmer M BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e068442.

PMID: 37899165 PMC: 10618966. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068442.


The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices.

Socha M, Flis W, Wartega M, Stankiewicz M, Kunicka A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 37373798 PMC: 10299393. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124106.


References
1.
Keirse M . Prostaglandins in preinduction cervical ripening. Meta-analysis of worldwide clinical experience. J Reprod Med. 1993; 38(1 Suppl):89-100. View

2.
Curtis P, Evens S, Resnick J . Uterine hyperstimulation. The need for standard terminology. J Reprod Med. 1987; 32(2):91-5. View

3.
Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A . Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (6):CD001338. PMC: 6513439. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001338.pub3. View

4.
Hamura N, Bolnga J, Wangnapi R, Horne A, Rogerson S, Unger H . The impact of tubal ectopic pregnancy in Papua New Guinea--a retrospective case review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13:86. PMC: 3633071. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-86. View

5.
Kundodyiwa T, Alfirevic Z, Weeks A . Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181945859. View