Development and Feasibility of Inlife: A Pilot Study of an Online Social Support Intervention for Informal Caregivers of People with Dementia

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2017 Sep 9

PMID 28886056

Citations 31

Authors

Alieske E H Dam

Martin P J van Boxtel

Nico Rozendaal

Frans R J Verhey

Marjolein E de Vugt

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Informal caregivers of individuals with dementia have an increased risk to face social isolation due to progression of the disease. Online social media interventions might offer a new opportunity to increase access to social support and enhance positive interactions and openness in dementia care networks.

Objective: This explorative pilot study describes (1) the development of an online social support intervention Inlife, and (2) the evaluation of the feasibility of this intervention and the measurements to assess its effectiveness.

Methods: The Medical Research Council (MRC) framework guided the development of the online social support intervention. This is a stepwise approach that integrates potential users' views with the development and validation of the program content. The program was developed by combining (1) individual caregiver interviews (n = 10), (2) focus group sessions with experts and web designers (n = 6), and (3) individual think-aloud tests (n = 2). Subsequently, a pilot study with informal caregivers was conducted (n = 25) to examine the program's feasibility and preliminary effectiveness. Online self-report measures were completed at baseline and at four follow-up time points.

Results: In total, 23 participants completed the newly developed Inlife intervention. Despite the high number of low-active users (17/23, 73%), Inlife had a good feasibility score of 7.1 (range: 1-10). The Calendar and Timeline were used most frequently and contributed to better care coordination and positive interactions.

Conclusions: Although the Inlife platform received a sufficient feasibility rating, the uptake was not optimal. Therefore, the Inlife platform was adapted to limit the number of low-active users and improve user friendliness. Recommendations for additional treatment adherence were provided. The development according to the MRC framework and the sufficient feasibility rating of Inlife formed the basis for a future effectiveness study.

Citing Articles

Designing and Evaluating IT Applications for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review.

Premanandan S, Ahmad A, Cajander A, Agerfalk P, van Gemert-Pijnen L J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e57393.

PMID: 39442167 PMC: 11541158. DOI: 10.2196/57393.

Unpaid carers of people with dementia and information communication technology: Use, impact and ideas for the future.

Damant J, Freddolino P, Dangoor M, Hu B, King D, Wittenberg R Dementia (London). 2024; 23(5):779-799.

PMID: 38664990 PMC: 11163843. DOI: 10.1177/14713012241249793.

What works to support carers of older people and older carers? an international evidence map of interventions and outcomes.

Spiers G, Tan M, Astbury J, Hall A, Ahmed N, Lanyi K BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):301.

PMID: 38553679 PMC: 10979610. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04897-3.

Design of a Dyadic Digital Health Module for Chronic Disease Shared Care: Development Study.

Benmessaoud C, Pfisterer K, De Leon A, Saragadam A, El-Dassouki N, Young K JMIR Hum Factors. 2023; 10:e45035.

PMID: 38145480 PMC: 10775044. DOI: 10.2196/45035.

Adaptation of an In-Person Mind-Body Movement Program for People with Cognitive Impairment or Dementia and Care Partners for Online Delivery: Feasibility, Satisfaction and Participant-Reported Outcomes.

Nicosia F, Lee J, Chesney M, Benjamin C, Lee A, Mehling W Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2023; 12:27536130231202989.

PMID: 37745819 PMC: 10515582. DOI: 10.1177/27536130231202989.

References

Cohen S, Wills T . Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985; 98(2):310-57. View

Schulz R, Martire L . Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects, and support strategies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004; 12(3):240-9. View

de Vugt M, Droes R . Social health in dementia. Towards a positive dementia discourse. Aging Ment Health. 2017; 21(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1262822. View

Jaspers M . A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int J Med Inform. 2008; 78(5):340-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.10.002. View

Leinonen E, Korpisammal L, Pulkkinen L, Pukuri T . The comparison of burden between caregiving spouses of depressive and demented patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001; 16(4):387-93. DOI: 10.1002/gps.351. View

Beeson R . Loneliness and depression in spousal caregivers of those with Alzheimer's disease versus non-caregiving spouses. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2003; 17(3):135-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-9417(03)00057-8. View

Aalbers T, Baars M, Qin L, de Lange A, Kessels R, Rikkert M . Using an eHealth Intervention to Stimulate Health Behavior for the Prevention of Cognitive Decline in Dutch Adults: A Study Protocol for the Brain Aging Monitor. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015; 4(4):e130. PMC: 4704922. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.4468. View

Kerkhof Y, Graff M, Bergsma A, de Vocht H, Droes R . Better self-management and meaningful activities thanks to tablets? Development of a person-centered program to support people with mild dementia and their carers through use of hand-held touch screen devices. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016; 28(11):1917-1929. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610216001071. View

Glueckauf R, Ketterson T, Loomis J, Dages P . Online support and education for dementia caregivers: overview, utilization, and initial program evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2004; 10(2):223-32. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2004.10.223. View

10.

Amieva H, Stoykova R, Matharan F, Helmer C, Antonucci T, Dartigues J . What aspects of social network are protective for dementia? Not the quantity but the quality of social interactions is protective up to 15 years later. Psychosom Med. 2010; 72(9):905-11. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181f5e121. View

11.

Dam A, de Vugt M, Klinkenberg I, Verhey F, van Boxtel M . A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: Are they doing what they promise?. Maturitas. 2016; 85:117-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.12.008. View

12.

Boots L, Wolfs C, Verhey F, Kempen G, de Vugt M . Qualitative study on needs and wishes of early-stage dementia caregivers: the paradox between needing and accepting help. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015; 27(6):927-36. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610214002804. View

13.

Dam A, Boots L, van Boxtel M, Verhey F, de Vugt M . A mismatch between supply and demand of social support in dementia care: a qualitative study on the perspectives of spousal caregivers and their social network members. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017; 30(6):881-892. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610217000898. View

14.

Schaller S, Marinova-Schmidt V, Setzer M, Kondylakis H, Griebel L, Sedlmayr M . Usefulness of a Tailored eHealth Service for Informal Caregivers and Professionals in the Dementia Treatment and Care Setting: The eHealthMonitor Dementia Portal. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016; 5(2):e47. PMC: 4822652. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.4354. View

15.

Boots L, de Vugt M, Withagen H, Kempen G, Verhey F . Development and Initial Evaluation of the Web-Based Self-Management Program "Partner in Balance" for Family Caregivers of People With Early Stage Dementia: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016; 5(1):e33. PMC: 4795319. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5142. View

16.

Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

17.

Blom M, Bosmans J, Cuijpers P, Zarit S, Pot A . Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internet intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2013; 13:17. PMC: 3557221. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-17. View

18.

Bennett G, Glasgow R . The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30:273-92. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235. View

19.

Cacioppo J, Fowler J, Christakis N . Alone in the crowd: the structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 97(6):977-91. PMC: 2792572. DOI: 10.1037/a0016076. View

20.

Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, Iliffe S, von Renteln Kruse W, Beck J . Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006; 46(4):503-13. DOI: 10.1093/geront/46.4.503. View