» Articles » PMID: 28882772

Early Elective Versus Delayed Elective Surgery in Acute Recurrent Diverticulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Int J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 Sep 9
PMID 28882772
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate outcomes of early versus delayed surgery in patients with acute recurrent diverticulitis.

Methods: We performed a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards. We conducted a search of electronic information sources, including MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; and ISRCTN Register, and bibliographic reference lists to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating outcomes of early versus delayed surgery in patients with acute recurrent diverticulitis. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the risk of bias of included studies. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data.

Results: We identified three retrospective and one prospective cohort studies enrolling a total of 1046 patients. The included patients were comparable in terms of age, ASA score and Hinchey classifications (Hinchey I and II). The results of our analyses suggested that there was no difference between two groups in surgical site infection [Odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% CI 0.79-3.27, P = 0.19], intra-abdominal abscess (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.21-4.00, P = 0.91), anastomotic leak (OR1.27, 95% CI 0.50-3.25, P = 0.61), 30-day mortality [Risk difference (RD) 0.00 95% CI -0.01-0.01, P = 0.80], postoperative ileus (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.50-3.66, P = 0.55), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.32-2.69, P = 0.89), ureteric injury (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.08-5.07, P = 0.65), and overall morbidity (OR 1.42 95% CI 0.76-2.66, P = 0.27). The early surgery was associated with longer operative time [Mean Difference (MD) 12.8, 95% CI 5.08-20.53, P = 0.001] and length of stay (MD 4.41, 95% CI -0.34-8.53, P = 0.03). Among those undergoing laparoscopic surgery, conversion to open surgery was higher in the early surgery group (OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.36-5.40, P = 0.005).

Conclusions: The best available evidence suggests that there is no difference between early elective and delayed elective surgery for acute recurrent diverticulitis in terms of clinical outcomes. However, longer operative time and length of stay and higher conversion rate to open surgery associated with early elective surgery may make the delayed elective surgery more cost-effective. The best available evidence is derived from non-randomised studies; therefore, high quality randomised controlled trials are required to provide more robust basis for definite conclusions.

Citing Articles

The optimal timing of elective surgery in sigmoid diverticular disease: a meta-analysis.

Vaghiri S, Prassas D, Knoefel W, Krieg A Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(8):3259-3274.

PMID: 36214867 PMC: 9722804. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02698-z.


Distant free air is not a contraindication for definitive laparoscopic treatment of acute perforated diverticulitis: a multi-center experience.

Fratta E, Mari G, Crippa J, Siracusa C, Costanzi A, Sassun R Updates Surg. 2022; 74(5):1665-1673.

PMID: 35804223 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01324-3.


The clinical effect and safety of new preoperative fasting time guidelines for elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

He Y, Wang R, Wang F, Chen L, Shang T, Zheng L Gland Surg. 2022; 11(3):563-575.

PMID: 35402209 PMC: 8984990. DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-49.


Early elective versus elective sigmoid resection in diverticular disease: not only timing matters-a single institutional retrospective review of 133 patients.

Vaghiri S, Jagalla D, Prassas D, Knoefel W, Krieg A Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(4):1613-1623.

PMID: 35194650 PMC: 9283160. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02464-1.


The Indications for and Timing of Surgery for Diverticular Disease.

Lock J, Galata C, Reissfelder C, Ritz J, Schiedeck T, Germer C Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020; 117(35-36):591-596.

PMID: 33161943 PMC: 7779853. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0591.