» Articles » PMID: 28879598

Implications of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Etiology on Recurrence and Prognosis After Curative-Intent Resection: a Multi-Institutional Study

Abstract

Background: We sought to investigate the prognosis of patients following curative-intent surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by hepatitis B (HBV-ICC), hepatolithiasis (Stone-ICC), and no identifiable cause (conventional ICC) etiologic subtype.

Methods: 986 patients with HBV-ICC (n = 201), stone-ICC (n = 103), and conventional ICC (n = 682) who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to mitigate residual bias.

Results: HBV-ICC patients more often had cirrhosis, earlier stage tumors, a mass-forming lesion, well-to-moderate tumor differentiation, and an R0 resection versus stone-ICC or conventional ICC patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival among HBV-ICC and conventional ICC patients was 23.9 and 17.8%, respectively, versus a recurrence-free of only 8.3% among patients with stone-ICC. Similarly, 5-year overall survival among patients with stone-ICC was only 18.3% compared with 48.9 and 38.0% for patients with HBV-ICC and conventional ICC, respectively. On PSM, patients with stone-ICC group had equivalent long-term outcomes as HBV-ICC patients. In contrast, on PSM, stone-ICC patients had a median overall survival of only 18.0 months versus 44.0 months for patients with conventional ICC. Median overall survival after intrahepatic-only recurrence among patients who had stone-ICC (6.0 months) was worse than OS among HBV-ICC (13.0 months) or conventional ICC (12.0 months) (p = 0.006 and p = 0.082, respectively).

Conclusions: While HBV-ICC had a better prognosis on unadjusted analyses, these differences were mitigated on PSM suggesting no stage-for-stage differences in outcomes compared with stone-ICC or conventional ICC. In contrast, patients with stone-ICC had worse long-term outcomes. These data highlight the relative importance of ICC etiology relative to established clinicopathological factors in the prognosis of patients with ICC.

Citing Articles

Early Onset Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical Characteristics, Oncological Outcomes, and Genomic/Transcriptomic Features.

Tsilimigras D, Han X, Guglielmi A, Aldrighetti L, Weiss M, Bauer T Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(5):3087-3097.

PMID: 38347332 PMC: 10997729. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15013-5.


Evaluating prognostic value of biliary stone in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by propensity score matching analysis.

Wang Y, Huang A, Guo D, Wang J, Chen F, Sun H J Cancer. 2023; 14(7):1257-1271.

PMID: 37215452 PMC: 10197931. DOI: 10.7150/jca.74275.


Disparities in curative treatments and outcomes for early stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States.

Lee Y, Singal A, Lauzon M, Agopian V, Luu M, Noureddin M Cancer. 2022; 128(20):3610-3619.

PMID: 35997126 PMC: 9530023. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34436.


Predicting prognosis and evaluating the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the tumor location in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: focusing on the involvement of below 2nd bile duct confluence.

Sohn H, Kim H, Kim J, Kang J, Han Y, Lee M Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022; 102(5):248-256.

PMID: 35611087 PMC: 9111963. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2022.102.5.248.


Recurrence and prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with different etiology after radical resection: a multi-institutional study.

Li Q, Chen C, Su J, Qiu Y, Wu H, Song T BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):329.

PMID: 35346122 PMC: 8962079. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09448-w.


References
1.
Buettner S, van Vugt J, IJzermans J, Groot Koerkamp B . Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: current perspectives. Onco Targets Ther. 2017; 10:1131-1142. PMC: 5328612. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S93629. View

2.
Sia D, Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Roayaie S, Ferrer J, Tabak B . Integrative molecular analysis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals 2 classes that have different outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144(4):829-40. PMC: 3624083. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.001. View

3.
Ahn C, Hwang S, Lee Y, Kim K, Moon D, Ha T . Prognostic impact of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. ANZ J Surg. 2016; 88(3):212-217. DOI: 10.1111/ans.13753. View

4.
Wilkens L, Bredt M, Flemming P, Klempnauer J, Heinrich Kreipe H . Differentiation of multicentric origin from intra-organ metastatic spread of hepatocellular carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization. J Pathol. 2000; 192(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::AID-PATH671>3.0.CO;2-Z. View

5.
Horino K, Beppu T, Komori H, Masuda T, Hayashi H, Okabe H . Evaluation of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with viral hepatitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012; 59(116):1217-9. DOI: 10.5754/hge09739. View