» Articles » PMID: 28879040

Comparison of Effects Between Calcium Channel Blocker and Diuretics in Combination with Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker on 24-h Central Blood Pressure and Vascular Hemodynamic Parameters in Hypertensive Patients: Study Design for a Multicenter,...

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a risk factor for coronary heart disease and stroke, and is one of the leading causes of death. Although over a billion people are affected worldwide, only half of them receive adequate treatment. Current guidelines on antihypertensive treatment recommend combination therapy for patients not responding to monotherapy, but as the number of pills increase, patient compliance tends to decrease. As a result, fixed-dose combination drugs with different antihypertensive agents have been developed and widely used in recent years. CCBs have been shown to be better at reducing central blood pressure and arterial stiffness than diuretics. Recent studies have reported that central blood pressure and arterial stiffness are associated with cardiovascular outcomes. This trial aims to compare the efficacy of combination of calcium channel blocker (CCB) or thiazide diuretic with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB).

Methods: This is a multicenter, double-blinded, active-controlled, phase 4, randomized trial, comparing the antihypertensive effects of losartan/amlodipine and losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients unresponsive to treatment with losartan. The primary endpoint is changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are changes in msSBP, mean 24-h ambulatory mobile blood pressure, mean 24-h ambulatory mobile central SBP, mean 24-h ambulatory carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, ambulatory augmentation index, and microalbuminuria/proteinuria after 20 weeks of treatment. The sample size will be 119 patients for each group in order to confer enough power to test for non-inferiority regarding the primary outcome.

Conclusion: The investigators aim to prove that combination of a CCB with ARB shows non-inferiority in lowering blood pressure compared with a combination of thiazide diuretic and ARB. We also hope to distinguish the subset of patients that are more responsive to certain types of combination drugs. The results of this study should aid physicians in selecting appropriate combination regimens to treat hypertension in certain populations.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02294539. Registered 12 November 2014.

Citing Articles

Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors on Arterial Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Li X, Chang P, Wang Q, Hu H, Bai F, Li N Cardiovasc Ther. 2020; 2020:7056184.

PMID: 32190121 PMC: 7068147. DOI: 10.1155/2020/7056184.


The association of smoothness index of central blood pressure with ambulatory carotid femoral pulse wave velocity after 20-week treatment with losartan in combination with amlodipine versus hydrochlorothiazide.

Shin J, Lee H, Chung W, Youn H, Cho E, Sung K J Hypertens. 2019; 37(12):2490-2497.

PMID: 31373922 PMC: 6855339. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002202.


Comparison of 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Blood Pressure Reduction Efficacy Between Fixed Amlodipine or Up-Titrated Hydrochlorothiazide Plus Losartan: The K-Central Study.

Cho E, Lee H, Sung K, Park S, Sohn I, Park C Am J Hypertens. 2019; 32(10):992-1002.

PMID: 31099387 PMC: 6758941. DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpz050.


Chlorthalidone, not hydrochlorothiazide, is the right diuretic for comparison.

Mehta R, Pareek A, Purkait I Clin Hypertens. 2018; 24:4.

PMID: 29507752 PMC: 5831582. DOI: 10.1186/s40885-018-0089-1.


Amlodipine Vs. hydrochlorothiazide: is there any disparity in its antihypertensive effect or not?.

Jonnalagadda V, Choudhary K, Matety V Clin Hypertens. 2017; 23:27.

PMID: 29234523 PMC: 5719742. DOI: 10.1186/s40885-017-0082-0.

References
1.
Jiang X, ORourke M, Zhang Y, He X, Liu L . Superior effect of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor over a diuretic for reducing aortic systolic pressure. J Hypertens. 2007; 25(5):1095-9. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280ac1533. View

2.
. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group. JAMA. 1991; 265(24):3255-64. View

3.
Kondo K, Toh R, Ishida T, Mori K, Yasuda T, Hirata K . Comparison of telmisartan/amlodipine and telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of Japanese patients with uncontrolled hypertension: the TAT-Kobe study. Blood Press Monit. 2016; 21(3):171-7. DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000172. View

4.
Boutouyrie P, Achouba A, Trunet P, Laurent S . Amlodipine-valsartan combination decreases central systolic blood pressure more effectively than the amlodipine-atenolol combination: the EXPLOR study. Hypertension. 2010; 55(6):1314-22. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.148999. View

5.
Min J, Min K, Hong J, Kim E, Yang B . Compliance and persistence of free-combination antihypertensive therapy versus single-pill combination in Korean hypertensive patients. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168(4):4576-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.070. View